2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density distribution of the type E2 glenoid in cuff tear arthropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last decade, primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, and shoulder instability have all been reported to affect glenoid BMD distribution. 22 , 23 , 33 , 34 , 35 However, a thorough understanding of normal glenoid BMD and its distribution (in relation to age, sex, and anatomical location) are important because only comparison with normative data will allow to determine how BMD distribution increased (as suggested by Wolff's law) or conversely decreased secondary to cavitation or unloading. 36 Current recommendations regarding implant orientation preclude a uniform BMD distribution; corrective glenoid bone reaming, however, expose the implant to potentially lower BMD and therefore compromise initial fixation strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, and shoulder instability have all been reported to affect glenoid BMD distribution. 22 , 23 , 33 , 34 , 35 However, a thorough understanding of normal glenoid BMD and its distribution (in relation to age, sex, and anatomical location) are important because only comparison with normative data will allow to determine how BMD distribution increased (as suggested by Wolff's law) or conversely decreased secondary to cavitation or unloading. 36 Current recommendations regarding implant orientation preclude a uniform BMD distribution; corrective glenoid bone reaming, however, expose the implant to potentially lower BMD and therefore compromise initial fixation strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having more CTA subjects below 65 years old may change the age association with CTA-CTRL difference. Nonetheless, lower inferior glenoid BMD compared to superior for CTA subjects has been reported before [20]. For the effect of BMI increase from 17 to 32 on the CTA-CTRL ST BMD difference, the same argument applies as for the OA-CTRL, as the maximum change reaches a 45.5 [-3.9, 131.9] HU decrease in anterior-superior octant for male (Table A4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…While imaging methods, CT-scan and MRI provide useful information for the operational planning, there is still a need for better understanding the biochemical background of bone loos resulting primarily from degenerative diseases [4]. According to the literature, there is only a limited number of publications available investigating the bone density of humerus head and glenoid cavity in patients with shoulder arthroplasty, especially by using thermal analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%