1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199812)107:4<371::aid-ajpa1>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dental anthropology of Central-Southern, Iron Age Italy: The evidence of metric versus nonmetric traits

Abstract: Discrete and metric dental traits are used to assess biological similarities and differences among 13 bioarchaeological populations located on each side of the Apennine mountains in central-southern Italy and dated to the first millennium BC. An initial hypothesis, that the mountain chain might provide a significant geographical barrier for population movement (resulting in greater biological affinities among those groups on the same side), is not supported. Instead, the samples appear to cluster more on the b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, correspondence analysis (using Procedure Correspondence in SPSS 11.5) was employed to identify those traits that vary most among samples. This technique was used in a number of anthropological studies (e.g., Greenacre and Degos, 1977;Schneider, 1986;Sciulli, 1990;Kitagawa et al, 1995;Coppa et al, 1998), including analyses of discrete dental traits.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, correspondence analysis (using Procedure Correspondence in SPSS 11.5) was employed to identify those traits that vary most among samples. This technique was used in a number of anthropological studies (e.g., Greenacre and Degos, 1977;Schneider, 1986;Sciulli, 1990;Kitagawa et al, 1995;Coppa et al, 1998), including analyses of discrete dental traits.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining categorical and continuous data in a single analysis is not new to biological anthropology . Richtsmeier et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining categorical and continuous data in a single analysis is not new to biological anthropology (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Richtsmeier et al (13) explore the relationship of nonmetric and metric data using the principle of functional cranial analysis and suggests "cranial metric variables [are] good predictors of nonmetric trait expression" (13:219-220).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We contrast the phenetic patterns with the archaeological evidence. This study is part of an extended chronological research project focusing on dental variation in Italian populations from the Upper Paleolithic to the Middle Ages (Coppa et al 1998(Coppa et al , 2007Cucina et al 1999). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%