Dental Cements for Definitive Luting: A Review and Practical Clinical Considerations

Hill, Edward E.

doi:10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.002

Cited by 114 publications

(149 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

140

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Mechanical interlocking with rough surfaces on a parallel wall preparation is the principal means of retention for luting cement, regardless of chemical composition (3).…”

Section: Retention and Bondingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the positive aspects of glass ionomer cements that have been used in dentistry since the seventies till present day, in order to improve some of their qualities and eliminate the disadvantages, resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) were developed in the late eighties by adding resin into glass ionomer cements (2,3).…”

Section: Glass Ionomer Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore soon after the primary setting reaction, unreacted materials below restoration margins need to be cleaned (3).…”

Section: Glass Ionomer Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Luting cements are used in adapting the tooth to indirect restorations prepared out of mouth (2). Luting agents may be permanent or temporary, depending on their physical properties and the planned longevity of the restoration (3).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Contemporary Permanent Luting Agents Used in Dentistry: A Literature Review

Sümer

Değer

2011

Int Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental cements are widely used in dentistry. Base material, temporary filling material and luting agents can all have different clinical applications. Different types of cement have also been developed for various orthodontic and endodontic treatments.In literature it is still argued that there is not ideal cement answering all purposes yet, so different materials are required for the comprehensive patient treatments and it is not always that easy to make the best choice.The aim of this article is to provide a clinically relevant discussion of contemporary permanent luting agents, in order to enhance the dentist's ability to make proper cementation choices and application.

show abstract

“…Mechanical interlocking with rough surfaces on a parallel wall preparation is the principal means of retention for luting cement, regardless of chemical composition (3).…”

Section: Retention and Bondingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Glass Ionomer Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore soon after the primary setting reaction, unreacted materials below restoration margins need to be cleaned (3).…”

Section: Glass Ionomer Cementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Contemporary Permanent Luting Agents Used in Dentistry: A Literature Review

Sümer

Değer

2011

Int Dent Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The adhesion of conventional resin-based luting cements is affected by the surface roughness of the preparation and dentin-cleansing agents used [12][13][14]. Resin cements infiltrate the dentinal tubules, exposed network of collagen and establish a micromechanical interlocking [15][16][17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adhesive strength of self-adhesive resins to lithium disilicate ceramic and dentin: effect of dentin chelating agents

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to test the effect of different chelating agents on microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. The occlusal surfaces of extracted human mandibular molars (N = 80) were cut horizontally to expose sound dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 20 per group) and dentin surfaces were conditioned according to one of the following methods: group C: no treatment (control group); group CH: 0.2 % chitosan; group E: 17 % ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and group P: 25 % polyacrylic acid (PAA). Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max CAD) blocks were cemented to conditioned dentin surfaces with self-adhesive cements (RelyX Unicem or Clearfil SA) and photo-polymerized. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h and thermocycled for 6,000 times. The beams were obtained from bonded ceramic-cement-tooth assemblies and were subjected to the MTBS test (1 mm/min). Failure types were analyzed and selected beams were examined under scanning electron microscope. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P < 0.05). While cement type significantly affected the MTBS results (P < 0.05), no significant difference was observed between the dentin chelating agents (P = 0.785). Interaction terms were not significant (P = 0.114). Control group with no dentin conditioning presented significantly lower results with both cements (RelyX Unicem: 8.1 ± 1.9(a), Clearfil SA: 8 ± 1.6(a)) than those of conditioned groups (19.3 ± 4.2(b)-24.5 ± 5.2(b)) (P < 0.05). Failure types were predominantly adhesive in all groups. Chitosan (2 %), EDTA (17 %) or PAA (25 %) could all be used as dentin chelating agents in conjunction with self-adhesive resin cements tested. Abstract:The aim of this study was to test the effect of different chelating agents on microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. The occlusal surfaces of extracted human mandibular molars (N=80) were cut horizontally to expose sound dentin. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=20 per group) and dentin surfaces were conditioned according to one of the following methods: Group C: No treatment (Control group); Group CH: 0.2% chitosan; Group E: 17% ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and Group P: 25% polyacrylic acid (PAA). Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (e.max CAD) blocks were cemented to conditioned dentin surfaces with self-adhesive cements (RelyX Unicem or Clearfil SA) and photo-polymerized.Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 o C for 24 hours and thermocycled for 6000 times.The beams were obtained from bonded ceramic-cement-tooth assemblies and they were subjected to the MTBS test (1 mm/min). Failure types were analyzed and selected beams were examined under scanning electron microscope. Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P<0.05). While cement type significantly affected the MTBS results (P<0.05), no significant difference was observed between the dentin chelating agents (...

show abstract