Dentoalveolar Trauma

Olynik, Christopher R.; Gray, Austin D.; Sinada, Ghassan G.

doi:10.1016/j.otc.2013.06.009

Cited by 11 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the biological reality of the “pillars and buttresses” of the facial skeleton is debatable, they still serve as important concepts in discussions of fracture reduction and repair, and are accepted anchor points for plates, screws, and other implants (Manson et al, ; Gruss and Mackinnon, ; Yamamoto et al, ; Nagasao et al, ; Andrades et al, ; Rodriguez et al, ; Bluebond‐Langner and Rodriguez, ; Olynik et al, ; Roumeliotis et al, ; Hurrell et al, ; Litschel and Suárez, ). The zygomatic complex is especially important because it is the strongest and most easily accessible of the vertical facial “pillars,” the zygoma serves as an important anchor point for zygomatic implants (Fernández et al, ), and zygomatic complex fractures due to motor vehicle accidents and interpersonal violence are the most common facial fractures treated by maxillofacial surgeons.…”

Section: How Useful Is the Pillar‐buttress Concept Clinically And Canmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of In Vivo Bone Strain Studies and Finite Element Models of the Zygomatic Complex in Humans and Nonhuman Primates: Implications for Clinical Research and Practice

Prado

Freire

Rossi

et al. 2016

The Anatomical Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The craniofacial skeleton is often described in the clinical literature as being comprised of vertical bony pillars, which transmit forces from the toothrow to the neurocranium as axial compressive stresses, reinforced transversely by buttresses. Here, we review the literature on bony microarchitecture, in vivo bone strain, and finite-element modeling of the facial skeleton of humans and nonhuman primates to address questions regarding the structural and functional existence of facial pillars and buttresses. Available bone material properties data do not support the existence of pillars and buttresses in humans or Sapajus apella. Deformation regimes in the zygomatic complex emphasize bending and shear, therefore conceptualizing the zygomatic complex of humans or nonhuman primates as a pillar obscures its patterns of stress, strain, and deformation. Human fossil relatives and chimpanzees exhibit strain regimes corroborating the existence of a canine-frontal pillar, but the notion of a zygomatic pillar has no support. The emerging consensus on patterns of strain and deformation in finite element models (FEMs) of the human facial skeleton corroborates hypotheses in the clinical literature regarding zygomatic complex function, and provide new insights into patterns of failure of titanium and resorbable plates in experimental studies. It is suggested that the "pillar and buttress" model of human craniofacial skeleton function be replaced with FEMs that more accurately and precisely represent in vivo function, and which can serve as the basis for future This article includes AR WOW Videos. Video 1 can be viewed at http://bcove.me/2mla49wp, Video 2 can be viewed at

show abstract

Section: How Useful Is the Pillar‐buttress Concept Clinically And Canmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review of In Vivo Bone Strain Studies and Finite Element Models of the Zygomatic Complex in Humans and Nonhuman Primates: Implications for Clinical Research and Practice

Prado

Freire

Rossi

et al. 2016

The Anatomical Record

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1,2,4,5 Pada cedera trauma maksilofasial akibat trauma seringkali melibatkan cedera multisistem, anamnesis dilakukan sejalan dengan pemeriksaan fisik, meliputi riwayat, mekanisme, lokasi dan waktu kejadian, riwayat pengobatan terdahulu, riwayat penurunan atau kehilangan kesadaran atau riwayat mual, dan muntah. 5,[7][8][9] Evaluasi terhadap potensi terjadinya aspirasi, gangguan jalan napas, dan gangguan neurologis harus dilakukan sebelum penatalaksanaan cedera dentoalveolar. 5,7,8 Selanjutnya akan dipaparkan penanganan sebuah kasus fraktur dentoalveolar dengan cedera kepala ringan.…”

Section: Latar Belakangunclassified

“…5,[7][8][9] Evaluasi terhadap potensi terjadinya aspirasi, gangguan jalan napas, dan gangguan neurologis harus dilakukan sebelum penatalaksanaan cedera dentoalveolar. 5,7,8 Selanjutnya akan dipaparkan penanganan sebuah kasus fraktur dentoalveolar dengan cedera kepala ringan.…”

Section: Latar Belakangunclassified

Dentoalveolar fractures with mild head injury

Ritangnga

Tajrin

Fauzi

2020

MDJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Trauma and injury to teeth and their supporting tissues often occur in cases of oromaxillofacial trauma. Oromaxillofacial trauma is found in 15% of all emergencies, with dentoalveolar trauma involvement in 2% of these cases. Objective: Management of dentoalveolar fractures with minor head injuries. Case: A 53-year-old man, traumatized by a single motorcycle accident and hit by a wooden board with his face hit first. The patient was unconscious shortly after the accident, then complained of pain in the lower lip and gums, teeth 11, 21 avulsed, 12, 22, 31, 21, 41, 42 mobile, and headache. Management: The inspection and handling of the airway was not carried out because it had been previously handled at Puskesmas. The patient was consulted on the Neurosurgery Department for a history of loss of consciousness, then under general anesthesia, definitive care was performed by attaching the eyelet splint to fix the anterior maxillary teeth, and fixation with Erich arch bar for the lower anterior teeth. Conclusion: Interdental wiring is an intraoperative fixation technique for dentoalveolar trauma, accompanied by eyelet splint and Erich arch bar. Patients with head trauma should be consulted to a neurosurgeon before definitive measures are taken.

show abstract

“…6 Appropriate root fracture location and direction along with osseous fragment location and size reached by CBCT may lead to a proper treatment plan. [7][8][9][10][11][12] CBCT images are acquired via an X-ray beam source that focuses towards a detector. The captured images are processed by a software and transformed into axial, coronal and sagittal images (multiplanar reconstruction).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%