2018
DOI: 10.5590/josc.2018.10.1.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Denzin’s Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research

Abstract: One approach to promote social change, mitigate bias, and enhance reaching data saturation is through triangulation: multiple sources of data. Triangulation adds depth to the data that are collected. In this scholarly essay, the authors discuss the continuing relevance of Denzin’s approach to triangulation of data. Included is a critique of researchers who have posited other approaches to triangulation that appear to be merely a renaming of Denzin’s original paradigm rather new outcomes. The intended audience … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
185
0
12

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
185
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Using multiple evidence would help this study to build a convergent validity and to reduce bias. This is also called a methodological triangulation (Fusch et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using multiple evidence would help this study to build a convergent validity and to reduce bias. This is also called a methodological triangulation (Fusch et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants responded in an equally open and forthcoming way to both interviewers. To maximize the trustworthiness of our data collection, we continued recruiting participants until no new major themes emerged [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process takes into account the context of the participants (Smith et al, 2009) and allows the necessary flexibility to make use of the life histories as a context for the triangulation of meanings of the data. The principal investigator conducted the analysis, and two additional researchers validated the findings in two triangulation sessions used to provide different perspectives for discussing the findings (Fusch, Fusch, & Ness, 2018). The participants reviewed the results to ensure that the original meaning of the data was retained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%