2005
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.44.1219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of Oxide Pattern Density Variation on Motor Current Endpoint Detection during Shallow Trench Isolation Chemical Mechanical Planarization

Abstract: In this study, we evaluate the limitations associated with variable shallow trench isolation (STI) oxide pattern densities for accurate motor current endpoint detection during chemical mechanical planarization (CMP). Results indicate that repeatable motor current endpoint detection can be achieved for STI wafers with oxide pattern density variations of up to 17.4%. Furthermore, results show that a dependence exists between the STI oxide pattern density variation and motor current endpoint success during polish… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor current measurement has been widely used for in situ monitoring of friction force during CMP. Sorooshian et al 5) studied the correlation between oxide pattern density and motor current endpoint detection (EPD) during shallow trench isolation CMP. Kim et al 6) presented that motor current signals were affected by hardware noise depending on the operation of the CMP polisher, such as pad conditioning and carrier oscillation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor current measurement has been widely used for in situ monitoring of friction force during CMP. Sorooshian et al 5) studied the correlation between oxide pattern density and motor current endpoint detection (EPD) during shallow trench isolation CMP. Kim et al 6) presented that motor current signals were affected by hardware noise depending on the operation of the CMP polisher, such as pad conditioning and carrier oscillation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The most popular of such methods measures the carrier or the platen motor current (CMC or PMC). [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] During polishings, both wafer and platen rotate at desired velocity setpoints. The pad-slurry-wafer interface undergoes a myriad of 3-body interactions which, due to the frictional forces involved, may facilitate or resist the platen and wafer rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The most popular of such alternate methods is centered around measuring the carrier, or the platen, motor current (CMC, or PMC). [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] During CMP, the wafer and the platen co-rotate at desired velocity setpoints. The pad-slurry-wafer interface undergoes a myriad of 3-body interactions which, due to the frictional forces involved, may facilitate or resist platen and wafer rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%