2010
DOI: 10.3103/s0027133010040047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependence of the height of disappearance for small meteoric bodies on their parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it can be seen in table 1, differences between observational and analytical values are remarkable (the standard deviation is σ = 4.11 km) and we conclude that the method proposed by Gritsevich and Popelenskaya (2008) cannot be extended to be applicable for decelerated fireballs without further modification, though it is usable to derive parameters of small meteoroids with constant velocity (Popelenskaya 2010). Figure 1 shows graphically the obtained differences between the observed and derived terminal height values based on equation ( 20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As it can be seen in table 1, differences between observational and analytical values are remarkable (the standard deviation is σ = 4.11 km) and we conclude that the method proposed by Gritsevich and Popelenskaya (2008) cannot be extended to be applicable for decelerated fireballs without further modification, though it is usable to derive parameters of small meteoroids with constant velocity (Popelenskaya 2010). Figure 1 shows graphically the obtained differences between the observed and derived terminal height values based on equation ( 20).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For these cases observed terminal heights will be crucial in setting margins on possible α and β values based on equation (20). Some initial steps in solving this problem were taken in Popelenskaya (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%