2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dependency-based semantic role labeling using sequence labeling with a structural SVM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A structural SVM was found to be suitable for SRL [7]. In this paper, we adopt the prior-model approach to facilitate domain adaptation in developing a structural SVM-based SRL system.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A structural SVM was found to be suitable for SRL [7]. In this paper, we adopt the prior-model approach to facilitate domain adaptation in developing a structural SVM-based SRL system.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our SRL model we adopt a structural SVM, which was developed to build an SRL system and found to be effective for performing SRL [7]. In this section, we provide explanation for theoretical aspects of the structural SVM described in that work for completeness and readability of this paper.…”
Section: Structural Learning Model For Srlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shalev-Shwartz et al (2011) proposed the Pegasos algorithm which takes a sub-gradient step with a predetermined step size and which can work in the mini-batch variant by choosing a set of examples and performing a sub-gradient step on it. Its structured 918 D. Mančev and B. Todorović version was successfully applied to various problems: dependency parsing (Martins et al, 2011), semantic role labeling (Lim et al, 2013), part-of-speech tagging (Ni et al, 2010), optical character recognition (Jaggi et al, 2012), and named entity recognition (Lee et al, 2011). The empirical performance indicated fast convergence with the results comparable with those of other structured algorithms, while Ratliff et al (2006) show that the cumulative prediction loss for the structured sub-gradient method grows only sublinearly in time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%