2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.97.062330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dephasing mechanisms of diamond-based nuclear-spin memories for quantum networks

Abstract: We probe dephasing mechanisms within a quantum network node consisting of a single nitrogenvacancy centre electron spin that is hyperfine coupled to surrounding 13 C nuclear-spin quantum memories. Previous studies have analysed memory dephasing caused by the stochastic electron-spin reset process, which is a component of optical internode entangling protocols. Here, we find, by using dynamical decoupling techniques and exploiting phase matching conditions in the electron-nuclear dynamics, that control infideli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
100
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
100
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Noise due to generation: One may wonder why one does not continuously trigger entanglement generation locally whenever the node wants a pair, or why one does not continuously produce pairs and then this entanglement is either discarded or otherwise made directly available. In the NV system, triggering entanglement generation causes the memory qubits to degrade faster [58,82]. As such we would like to achieve agreement between nodes to avoid triggering unless entanglement it is indeed desired.…”
Section: Hardware Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Noise due to generation: One may wonder why one does not continuously trigger entanglement generation locally whenever the node wants a pair, or why one does not continuously produce pairs and then this entanglement is either discarded or otherwise made directly available. In the NV system, triggering entanglement generation causes the memory qubits to degrade faster [58,82]. As such we would like to achieve agreement between nodes to avoid triggering unless entanglement it is indeed desired.…”
Section: Hardware Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between every entanglement attempt, the electron spin (communication qubit) needs to be reset. The dominant source of noise on the nuclear spins (memory qubits) during the entanglement attempts is due to this re-initialization of the electron spin, as described in [58]. We model the noise on the nuclear spins as a fixed amount of dephasing noise…”
Section: D4 Physical Entanglement Generation and Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a spin-mixing was both theoretically predicted [9,14,46] and experimentally confirmed. [8] If, however, the only spin-mixing process was due to ISC, the modeled population would end up in the m s = 0 state for sufficient long-lasting laser excitation and the modeled fluorescence would thus be maximized. Instead, the spin-dependent fluorescence curves in our experiment ( Fig.…”
Section: Rate Equation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] Furthermore, the electron spin may be coherently manipulated by microwave signals [6] and purely optically initialized as well as read-out. [7] Spin initialization and read-out are enabled by a spin-selective intersystem crossing (ISC) towards the singlet system: the long lifetime in the singlet system facilitates a spin-dependent fluorescence and a preferred decay towards the m s = 0 ground state, [8,9] allowing for fast spin initialization. Spin polarizations of about 80 % at room temperature [10,11] and over 99 % at liquid helium temperature [5] may be reached, as well as spin-dependent fluorescence contrasts of up to 30 % for an optical spin read-out under non-resonant laser excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%