1976
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(76)80875-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dephosphorylation of C55‐isoprenyl‐monophosphate by non‐specific phosphatases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one report on the characterization of a C 55 ‐P phosphatase had been published to date (Willoughby et al , 1972) but a potential involvement of nonspecific phosphatases that could explain the generation of the large pool of C 55 ‐OH was also suggested (Bohnenberger & Sandermann, 1976). The C 55 ‐P phosphatase activity detected in particulate fractions from S. aureus did not require any cation, was optimal at pH 5, and had an apparent K m for C 55 ‐P of 1.5 μM (Willoughby et al , 1972).…”
Section: Undecaprenyl Phosphate Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one report on the characterization of a C 55 ‐P phosphatase had been published to date (Willoughby et al , 1972) but a potential involvement of nonspecific phosphatases that could explain the generation of the large pool of C 55 ‐OH was also suggested (Bohnenberger & Sandermann, 1976). The C 55 ‐P phosphatase activity detected in particulate fractions from S. aureus did not require any cation, was optimal at pH 5, and had an apparent K m for C 55 ‐P of 1.5 μM (Willoughby et al , 1972).…”
Section: Undecaprenyl Phosphate Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of free undecaprenol is not well understood. Perhaps it is generated by phosphatase/pyrophosphatase cleavage of undecaprenyl phosphate and/or pyrophosphate (see (9)) or perhaps it is directly generated as the byproduct of one or more yet-to-be-discovered biosynthetic pathways. In any case it has been known for many years that Gram-positive bacteria contain a UDPK activity (27–29,38,81).…”
Section: Proteomics and Microbial Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein was determined by a modified Lowry procedure [6]. Radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting [13,14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%