2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deposition and re-entrainment of model colloids in saturated consolidated porous media: Experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Each BTC contains three segments corresponding to the three experimental phases. Recent studies (Franchi and O'Melia, 2003; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Redman et al, 2004; Shen et al, 2007, 2008; Canseco et al, 2009; Torkzaban et al, 2010; Johnson et al, 2010) have obtained evidence supporting the hypothesis that the colloids measured in phase 3 were those deposited at secondary minima in phase 1 and released upon elution with DI water, which eliminates the secondary minima of DLVO interaction energy curves. Microscopic observation (Liu et al, 2009) has further verified this hypothesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each BTC contains three segments corresponding to the three experimental phases. Recent studies (Franchi and O'Melia, 2003; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Redman et al, 2004; Shen et al, 2007, 2008; Canseco et al, 2009; Torkzaban et al, 2010; Johnson et al, 2010) have obtained evidence supporting the hypothesis that the colloids measured in phase 3 were those deposited at secondary minima in phase 1 and released upon elution with DI water, which eliminates the secondary minima of DLVO interaction energy curves. Microscopic observation (Liu et al, 2009) has further verified this hypothesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…6), the values of M 3 were found to be consistently larger in sand than in glass bead columns for both colloids at all four ionic strengths. However, the theoretical result was obtained by considering a very specific case (i.e., MIN) where DLVO interaction energies were minimum, as discussed previously using the concept of “interaction volume.” Previous theoretical studies (Suresh and Walz, 1996; Bhattacharjee et al, 1998; Rabinovich et al, 2000b; Cooper et al, 2001; Hoek et al, 2003; Hoek and Agarwal, 2006; Katainen et al, 2006) focused on examining the effects of surface roughness on reduction of the energy barrier but ignored its influence on colloid deposition at secondary minima, despite strong experimental evidence to the contrary (Litton and Olson, 1996; Hahn and O'Melia, 2004; Hahn et al, 2004; Redman et al, 2004; Tufenkji and Elimelech, 2004a, 2005; Shen et al, 2007, 2008, 2010; Canseco et al, 2009). Because colloids associated with collector surfaces via secondary minima are easily influenced by hydrodynamic shear, colloid attachments in secondary minima have been considered to occur mainly at low flow regions (e.g., grain–grain contacts) (Elimelech and O'Melia, 1990a,b; Johnson et al, 2007; Torkzaban et al, 2008; Bradford et al, 2009).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometrical configuration and physical parameters chosen for this study are based on recent experiments [29,30]. In those works, deposition and release of negatively charged colloidal latex particles of a radius, a p , of 400 nm in an artificial sintered silicate porous medium were investigated.…”
Section: Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport process is usually modelled by a mass balance equation with fixed release and deposition rates described as a first-order kinetic equation. This approach has been used for saturated porous media (Tosco et al 2009;Canesco et al 2009) but also in unsaturated soils (Massoudieh andGinn 2007, Torkzaban et al 2008;Simunek et al 2006). In the majority of the studies, a single class of fines is modelled but work has been done to take into account fines of different size or nature in the porous media or in fractures (James and Chrysikopoulos 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%