1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01072420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depressed delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity in alcoholic hepatitis

Abstract: Delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity was studied in 10 patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis, 9 patients with either inactive alcoholic cirrhosis or alcoholic fatty liver, and 10 agematched controls. The mean response of the alcoholic hepatitis group was significantly less compared to controls for SK-SD (P less than 0.001), mumps (P less than 0.001), trichophyton (P less than 0.025), and Candida albicans (P less than 0.025). Upon clinical recovery, the response of the 6 surviving patients with alcoholic hepat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that some of our alcoholic patients did not have abnormal or only slightly elevated hemagglutination titers is not explained but could be understood on the basis that a continuous antigen challenge may lead to immune tolerance or, alternatively, that alcohol, when consumed chronically in high doses, may act as an immunosuppressive drug (30). Supportive evidence is provided by the observation that alcoholic individuals have clinical signs of impaired cell-mediated immunity with reduced skin test reactions to a variety of antigens (31)(32)(33). Moreover, a disturbance in the humoral immune response is indicated by reports that ethanol consumption at the time of antigenic challenge can result in a lack of or a poor immune response to an antigen not previously experienced, although a normal anamnestic response to antigens recognized earlier may occur (34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The finding that some of our alcoholic patients did not have abnormal or only slightly elevated hemagglutination titers is not explained but could be understood on the basis that a continuous antigen challenge may lead to immune tolerance or, alternatively, that alcohol, when consumed chronically in high doses, may act as an immunosuppressive drug (30). Supportive evidence is provided by the observation that alcoholic individuals have clinical signs of impaired cell-mediated immunity with reduced skin test reactions to a variety of antigens (31)(32)(33). Moreover, a disturbance in the humoral immune response is indicated by reports that ethanol consumption at the time of antigenic challenge can result in a lack of or a poor immune response to an antigen not previously experienced, although a normal anamnestic response to antigens recognized earlier may occur (34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There have been many reports about immunological aspects of ALD, but they have not been consistent, because each report has been a reflection of the immunological experimental procedures available when the investigation was performed. For example, various pathogeneses, such as an antibody against Mallory body [10,11], an antibody against lipopolysaccharide [12], an antibody against self-antigen or alcoholic adducts [13][14][15][16][17], cytotoxic T cells [18][19][20][21], decrease in cellular immunity [22][23][24], IgA [25][26][27], phagocytic activity [28], and cytokines [29][30][31], have been considered as causes for alcoholic hepatitis in a long research history of alcoholic liver diseases [32]. We review the immunological aspects of alcoholic hepatitis in this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I NCREASED INCIDENCE AND severity of a wide variety of infections have long been observed in chronic alcoholic individuals (Cook, 1998;Lau et al, 2009;MacGregor and Louria, 1997;Szabo, 1999;Zhang et al, 2008). Chronic ethanol (EtOH) exposure impairs T-cell responses to antigenic challenge in both humans and animal models (Chang and Norman, 1999;Geissler et al, 1997;Gluckman et al, 1977;Gurung et al, 2009;Meyerholz et al, 2008;Snyder et al, 1978;Tonnesen et al, 1992). These observed deficiencies are clearly due in part to intrinsic EtOH-induced T-cell defects; however, failure of EtOH-exposed dendritic cells (DCs) to appropriately activate T cells could also play a significant role in suboptimal T-cell function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%