1964
DOI: 10.1056/nejm196412172712505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depression of the Tuberculin Reaction by Viral Vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[51][52][53][54][55][56][57] However, the short-lived immunosuppression caused by certain vaccines does not result in an increased risk of infections with other pathogens soon after vaccination. Vaccinated children are not at greater risk of subsequent infections with other pathogens than unvaccinated children.…”
Section: Do Vaccines "Weaken" the Immune System? Do Vaccines Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51][52][53][54][55][56][57] However, the short-lived immunosuppression caused by certain vaccines does not result in an increased risk of infections with other pathogens soon after vaccination. Vaccinated children are not at greater risk of subsequent infections with other pathogens than unvaccinated children.…”
Section: Do Vaccines "Weaken" the Immune System? Do Vaccines Increasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classic observation in this field was made in 1907 by von Pirquet, who described a decreased reactivity to the tuberculin skin test as a result of infection with measles virus; it has since been repeatedly confirmed and studied in great detail (1). Moreover, depression of tuberculin sensitivity in man also occurs after infection with varicella, influenza, and rubella virus, as well as after vaccination with measles, polio, yellow fever, and mumps virus (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Similar effects have been reported in animals; for example, using skin allograft survival as a measure of cell-mediated immunity, Howard et al showed that graft survival times were significantly prolonged in mice infected with lactic dehydrogenase virus shortly before or after grafting, and there are many other examples of immunodepression in animals after virus infection (9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among arbovi ruses, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus leads to enhanced antibody response to hu man y-globulin [11] while Junin virus sup presses the response to SRBC and human ■/-globulin [25], As regards the effect on CMI, yellow fever virus has been shown to suppress the delayed-type skin reactivity [3], The mechanism by which these viruses bring about immunosuppression is not clear. It has been proposed that viral antigens might compete with another antigen in the production of antibody thereby suppressing the response to the latter antigen [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%