1993
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6917.1458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deprivation, low birth weight, and children's height: a comparison between rural and urban areas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social epidemiologists have reported stark differences between neighborhoods in age-adjusted mortality rates, with the residents of impoverished areas being much more likely to die young (51,59,98). Several ecological studies likewise revealed higher mortality rates and worse health in geographic aggregates characterized by widespread deprivation or concentrated disadvantage (37,97,101,105,115,122). These findings raise the possibility that characteristics of shared physical or social environments may make important contributions to individual health.…”
Section: Questions About Multilevel Etiologymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Social epidemiologists have reported stark differences between neighborhoods in age-adjusted mortality rates, with the residents of impoverished areas being much more likely to die young (51,59,98). Several ecological studies likewise revealed higher mortality rates and worse health in geographic aggregates characterized by widespread deprivation or concentrated disadvantage (37,97,101,105,115,122). These findings raise the possibility that characteristics of shared physical or social environments may make important contributions to individual health.…”
Section: Questions About Multilevel Etiologymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The evidence on quality of care, however, suggests that service accessibility is poorer in rural areas [1,2]. While health services in urban settings may be within relatively easy reach, patients in rural areas often have to travel long distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies have looked at the relation between living in an area with a certain set of socioeconomic characteristics and (a) mortality risk, (b) morbidity, and (c) health behaviors. These studies have reported an association between area socioeconomic status and all-cause mortality (2,10,11,16,25,27,32,36,42,47,61,66,69,70,86,110,113), cardiovascular mortality (41,60,63,72), infant mortality (14,73), suicide (31), birth weight (82,117), neural tube defects (115), cardiovascular diseases (20), long-term limiting illness (3,16,98), chronic conditions (24,85), disability (7,46), depression (126), child health outcomes (81), pediatric injury (23), chronic disease symptoms (17,37,44,77), smoking (55), and physical activity (125). Although the majority of these studies showed an association, there are a few that reported no association between community SES and morbidity (43) and some that showed an indefinite association with child pedestrian injury and low birth weight (8,84,…”
Section: Community Socioeconomic Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%