1953
DOI: 10.1037/h0053992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deprivation of visual form definition in the ring dove: II. Perceptual-motor transfer.

Abstract: This paper is based on part of a dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Department of Psychology of New York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The author wishes to express gratitude to Dr. T. C. Schneirla for methodological and theoretical aid from the initial planning stages to the final reports of these experiments. Gratitude is also expressed to the Department of Animal Behavior of the American Museum of Natural History for the use of its exp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
5
0
1

Year Published

1957
1957
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
5
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is consistent evidence that if an organism is deprived of exposure to normal stimulus heterogeneity along some continuum, is brought to a high criterional level on a dis-crimination, and is tested for transfer along an independent dimension also involved in the deprivation, then generalization will be steeper. We have evidence for the pigeon (Siegel, 1953), chicken (Tucker, 1955), rat (Forgus, 1954), cat (Riesen, Kurke, & Mellinger, 1953), chimpanzee (Chow &Nissen, 1955), andman (Senden, 1932). Deprivation of form vision was involved in all cases, monocularly in the pigeon, chicken, cat, and chimpanzee studies.…”
Section: The Effect Of Visual Experience On Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There is consistent evidence that if an organism is deprived of exposure to normal stimulus heterogeneity along some continuum, is brought to a high criterional level on a dis-crimination, and is tested for transfer along an independent dimension also involved in the deprivation, then generalization will be steeper. We have evidence for the pigeon (Siegel, 1953), chicken (Tucker, 1955), rat (Forgus, 1954), cat (Riesen, Kurke, & Mellinger, 1953), chimpanzee (Chow &Nissen, 1955), andman (Senden, 1932). Deprivation of form vision was involved in all cases, monocularly in the pigeon, chicken, cat, and chimpanzee studies.…”
Section: The Effect Of Visual Experience On Generalizationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The effects of the deprivation of pattern vision on interocular transfer have been recently investigated in birds (64), cats (54,55), and chimpanzees (9). It has been found that if, in rearing, both eyes have been exposed to patterned light (either simultaneously or alternately), the animal later trained monocularly on a visual discrimination problem transfers immediately to the untrained eye.…”
Section: Experimental Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of hoods (Chiu, Lauber, & Kinnear, 1975;Hess, 1956;Rossi, 1968;Siegel, 1953), goggles (Catania, 1963), patches (Cherkin, 1970;Lauber, McGinnis, & Boyd, 1965), and contact lenses (Zeier, 1970) have been used for this purpose. In our experience with young chicks, adult chickens, and ring doves, we have found that the most successful devices for long-term use are those that are lightweight, have no protruding edges, and are securely glued to the skin and feathers.…”
Section: Plastic Occludersmentioning
confidence: 99%