2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Depth profiling of organic materials using improved ion beam conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is routinely used in SIMS depth profiling by applying oxygen sputtering to increase positive ion yields and cesium sputtering to increase negative ion yields [17,18]. In those cases, the secondary ion yields strongly increase with the concentration of the reactive species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is routinely used in SIMS depth profiling by applying oxygen sputtering to increase positive ion yields and cesium sputtering to increase negative ion yields [17,18]. In those cases, the secondary ion yields strongly increase with the concentration of the reactive species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported that C 60 sputtering realizes extremely low damage for organic materials [2] and, using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), it shows better effectiveness with higher incident angle [3]. Cramer et al [4] explicitly reported C 60 sputtering is not suitable for bulk or spin-coated polycarbonate (PC) and polystyrene (PS) materials. They recommended cesium sputtering for PC and oxygen sputtering for PS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From much published information, and from our experience, we endeavor to perform depth profiling of PC and PS using C 60 , and to make a comparison against a * Corresponding author: shinichi_iida@ulvac.com previous report [4]. We have studied the incident angle dependence of some polymeric materials among the parameters that should be optimized which include: (i) ion beam energy/current, (ii) incident angle, (iii) temperature, and (iv) beam property, but little has been studied regarding the incident angle [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7,8] Several studies have examined the ion yields for a considerable variety of cluster species and target materials: [4][5][6][9][10][11] Very generally, with increasing cluster size, the yields appear to increase (sometimes even quite dramatically) whereas the number of emitted fragment molecules is reduced, to the extent that depth profiling of (thick) organic and biological layers and 3D imaging become feasible. [12][13][14][15][16] Extending the range of useful cluster ion species, large gas cluster ions such as Ar n + could constitute a viable option. The application of Ar n + cluster ions (with up to n = 10 000 or more) for ion surface modifications was pioneered by the Kyoto group of Yamada and Matsuo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%