2011
DOI: 10.17104/9783406619960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Der Kampf um die europäische Erinnerung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the decision to appoint her at least in part stemmed from the underrepresentation of Eastern European perspectives on the Committee of Experts and the criticism from Polish commentators in particular of its report's allegedly heavily Western European bias (Sauerland, ; Trüpel, , p. 187). More generally, MEPs from the new Eastern European EU Member States had actively lobbied for many years as part of the broader ‘fight over European remembrance’ (Leggewie, ) for changing the EP's own remembrance culture. They were keen to include the experience of Stalinism on a par with National Socialism as two totalitarian systems and sides of the same coin, and to insert Eastern European suffering under Stalinism and communism more effectively into pan‐European discourses (Neumayer, 2015; Troebst, ) – demands that Vovk van Gaal supported and which effectively downgraded the prevalent German and Western European discourse about the singularity of the Shoah.…”
Section: Curators and Historians Co‐operating On A European History Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the decision to appoint her at least in part stemmed from the underrepresentation of Eastern European perspectives on the Committee of Experts and the criticism from Polish commentators in particular of its report's allegedly heavily Western European bias (Sauerland, ; Trüpel, , p. 187). More generally, MEPs from the new Eastern European EU Member States had actively lobbied for many years as part of the broader ‘fight over European remembrance’ (Leggewie, ) for changing the EP's own remembrance culture. They were keen to include the experience of Stalinism on a par with National Socialism as two totalitarian systems and sides of the same coin, and to insert Eastern European suffering under Stalinism and communism more effectively into pan‐European discourses (Neumayer, 2015; Troebst, ) – demands that Vovk van Gaal supported and which effectively downgraded the prevalent German and Western European discourse about the singularity of the Shoah.…”
Section: Curators and Historians Co‐operating On A European History Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…market. 2 By exploring interconnections between two great European traumas, the Holocaust and the Gulag (Assmann 2013, Leggewie andLang 2011), they contest the view of the Holocaust as the pivotal trauma of Europe and at the same time recontextualise the Holocaust in its specific local environment.…”
Section: N Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C'est dans ce contexte que s'enracinent entre autres les travaux de Claus Leggewie, politiste à l'université de Giessen, selon lequel les grandes catastrophes du long XX e siècle pourraient servir de points d'ancrage et de départ pour fonder une conscience historique européenne. Leggewie croit qu'il pourrait être possible, en prenant en compte l'histoire des migrations mais aussi celle de la « success story européenne » depuis 1945, de poser les bases d'une identité européenne du « plus grand peuple pas encore entièrement constitué au monde » 52 .…”
Section: La Question De L'européisation Des Cultures Mémoriellesunclassified