2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation and validation of a waist circumference optimal cutoff for diagnosing metabolic syndrome in a South African mixed ancestry population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
36
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have suggested WC and BP cut-off points for various African populations [6, 3941], however, more epidemiological studies are needed to confirm that these suggested cut-off points can actually be used with confidence in the African population. Peer et al [13] reported optimal WC cut-off values based on a black population from Cape Town (83.9 cm men and 94 cm women) and confirmed the findings from Motala et al (2011) [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have suggested WC and BP cut-off points for various African populations [6, 3941], however, more epidemiological studies are needed to confirm that these suggested cut-off points can actually be used with confidence in the African population. Peer et al [13] reported optimal WC cut-off values based on a black population from Cape Town (83.9 cm men and 94 cm women) and confirmed the findings from Motala et al (2011) [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The small variations among the African-specific thresholds could be attributed at least in part to differences in methodological approaches. For example, while Matsha et al, [ 7 ] Peer et al, [ 8 ] and Motala et al [ 6 ] determined the optimal WC cut-off points for the presence of ≥2 MS components, [ 6 8 ] Crowther and Norris determined the optimal WC cut-off points for ≥3 out of 4 MS components, [ 5 ] Prinsloo et al used raised BP, [ 16 ] Kalk et al used insulin resistance (IR) and triglycerides-to-HDL-C ratio, [ 17 ] while Mabchour et al used elevated BP, total cholesterol-to-HDL-C ratio and IR as the outcome [ 9 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above average ABSI was associated with substantially higher risk of death in the United States (USA) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004 sample, and the excess mortality hazard associated with high ABSI was greater than that associated with above-average body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC) [1]. Several studies have sought to quantify associations between ABSI and adverse outcomes other than death, including diabetes [2], metabolic syndrome [3], and high blood pressure [4], [5]. ABSI seems a promising metric of health risk associated with abdominal adiposity [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%