1976
DOI: 10.1039/f19767200996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Derivation of activation energies from experiments on chemical activation of alkyl fluorides

Abstract: Chemical activation results from sixteen alkyl fluorides from n-propyl to 1 ,l,l-trifluoropropane have been treated by the RRKM theory. Critical energies for hydrogen halide elimination have been predicted from this treatment and compared where possible with thermal activation energies. Satisfactory agreement is obtained for a number of molecules. It is suggested that it is possible to predict critical energies for elimination from chemical activation results by this method. Alternatively known activation ener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b As in Table IV; A: PMP2/6-31G(d,p), B: ROMP2/6-311G(2d,2p), C: CCSD(T)/6-311++G(2d,p), D: CCSD(T)/AUG-cc-pVTZ. c Δ H R (expt) = ∑Δ H f = −18.8 ± 7.5 at 298 K; Δ H f 298 (CH 3 F) = −56.0 ± 6.9 (ref ), Δ H f 298 (OH) = 9.3 ± 0.3 (ref ), Δ H f 298 (H 2 O) = −57.7 ± 0.0 (ref ), Δ H f 298 (CH 2 F) = −6.9 (ref ), −7.8 (ref ), −7.6 (ref ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b As in Table IV; A: PMP2/6-31G(d,p), B: ROMP2/6-311G(2d,2p), C: CCSD(T)/6-311++G(2d,p), D: CCSD(T)/AUG-cc-pVTZ. c Δ H R (expt) = ∑Δ H f = −18.8 ± 7.5 at 298 K; Δ H f 298 (CH 3 F) = −56.0 ± 6.9 (ref ), Δ H f 298 (OH) = 9.3 ± 0.3 (ref ), Δ H f 298 (H 2 O) = −57.7 ± 0.0 (ref ), Δ H f 298 (CH 2 F) = −6.9 (ref ), −7.8 (ref ), −7.6 (ref ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models were developed for CF 3 CF 2 CH 3 and CH 3 -CF 2 CH 3 . An earlier version 14 for CH 3 CF 2 CH 3 , giving a value that was too high for the preexponential factor, was reevaluated because vibrational frequencies for the molecule are now available. 22 Vibrational frequencies have not been reported for CF 3 CF 2 CH 3 , so these were estimated from CH 3 CF 2 CH 3 , 22,23 CF 3 CF 2 CF 3 , 24 and CF 3 CH 2 CF 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate constant for loss of HF from CF 3 CF 2 CH 3 will be measured and matched to rates calculated using RRKM theory to determine the E o (HF). The threshold energy for CHF 2 CH 3 5 will be compared to those for CF 3 CF 2 CH 3 , CH 3 CF 2 CH 3 , CClF 2 CH 3 , and CF 3 CH 3 3,6 to ascertain the effect of replacing the H by the CF 3 , CH 3 , Cl, and F substituents, respectively, at the α-carbon. These trends should determine whether Cl or F substituents remove or release electron density at the α-carbon by comparison to the effect of an electron-withdrawing substituent, CF 3 , and to the effect of a CH 3 substituent, which provides electron density through hyperconjugation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this analysis, we estimate the uncertainty in E 0 's is ±2 kcal/mol. Cadman et al also developed an RRKM model for CF 3 CH 2 CH 3 and compared the calculations to unpublished experimental work for the formation of CF 3 CH 2 CH 3 by radical combination and by insertion of a CH 2 into the C−H bond of CF 3 CH 3 . Their RRKM model is based on a thermal preexponential factor considerably outside the range we adopted, and their thermochemistry gives 〈 E 〉's that differ by 5 kcal/mol from the present results, so their higher E 0 (68 kcal/mol) is not unexpected.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%