Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients

Abstract

Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) can provide simultaneous estimation of relative electron density ρe and effective atomic number Zeff. The ability to obtain these quantities (ρe, Zeff) has been shown to benefit selected radiotherapy applications where tissue characterization is required. The conventional analysis method (spectral method) relies on knowledge of the CT scanner photon spectra which may be difficult to obtain accurately. Furthermore an approximate empirical attenuation correction of the photon spectrum through the patient is necessary. We present an alternative approach based on a parameterization of the measured ratio of low and high kVp linear attenuation coefficients for deriving Zeff which does not require the estimation of the CT scanner spectra. In a first approach, the tissue substitute method (TSM), the Rutherford parameterization of the linear attenuation coefficients was employed to derive a relation between Zeff and the ratio of the linear attenuation coefficients measured at the low and high kVp of the CT scanner. A phantom containing 16 tissue mimicking inserts was scanned with a dual source DECT scanner at 80 and 140 kVp. The data from the 16 inserts phantom was used to obtain model parameters for the relation between Zeff and [Formula: see text]. The accuracy of the method was evaluated with a second phantom containing 4 tissue mimicking inserts. The TSM was compared to a more complex approach, the reference tissue method (RTM), which requires the derivation of stoichiometric fit parameters. These were derived from the 16 inserts phantom scans and used to calculate CT numbers at 80 and 140 kVp for a set of tabulated reference human tissues. Model parameters for the parameterization of [Formula: see text] were estimated for this reference tissue dataset and compared to the results of the TSM. Residuals on Zeff for the reference tissue dataset for both TSM and RTM were compared to those obtained from the spectral method. The tissue substitutes were well fitted by the TSM with R(2) = 0.9930. Residuals on Zeff for the phantoms were similar between the TSM and spectral methods for Zeff < 8 while they were improved by the TSM for higher Zeff. The RTM fitted the reference tissue dataset well with R(2) = 0.9999. Comparing the Zeff extracted from TSM and the more complex RTM to the known values from the reference tissue dataset yielded errors of up to 0.3 and 0.15 units of Zeff respectively. The parameterization approach yielded standard deviations which were up to 0.3 units of Zeff higher than those observed with the spectral method for Zeff around 7.5. Procedures for the DECT estimation of Zeff removing the need for estimates of the CT scanner spectra have been presented. Both the TSM and the more complex RTM performed better than the spectral method. The RTM yielded the best results for the reference human tissue dataset reducing errors from up to 0.3 to 0.15 units of Zeff compared to the simpler TSM. Both TSM and RTM are simpler to implement than the spectral method which requires est...

Dual‐energy CT quantitative imaging: a comparison study between twin‐beam and dual‐source CT scanners

“…The Z eff was obtained using the relation formulated by Landry et al between the ratio of the attenuation coefficients ( μ ) for low‐ and high‐energy, which resulted from the Rutherford et al parameterization of the linear attenuation coefficient as function of the scattering (coherent and incoherent) and the photoelectric effects. After converting the CT numbers into attenuation coefficients relative to water, the Z eff equation is where is the ratio between , and and A , B , C , D , E , F , m, and n are fit parameters.…”

“…This imaging modality results in two 3‐dimensional attenuation maps by scanning with two different photon spectra. Various methods have been described to transform these two sets of data from CT numbers to electron densities relative to water ( ρ e ) and effective atomic numbers ( Z eff ), quantities suitable for quantitative imaging. The additional Z eff information allows the distinction of different tissues types that have similar ρ e .…”

Simplified derivation of stopping power ratio in the human body from dual‐energy CT data

“…Hereafter, they are referred to as "Gammex-467-like tissue surrogates". The E k values were chosen so that the calculated CT numbers of the virtual Gammex-467-like tissue surrogates closely matched the experimental data for the actual Gammex 467 phantom measured by Landry et al 13 They performed DECT measurements by using a second generation dual-source CT (DSCT) scanner (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) operated at 80 kV and 140 kV/Sn. This method for finding a single effective energy for the continuum spectrum of a CT scanner was proposed by Han et al 5 (the basis of the method was originally presented by Rutherford et al 14 ).…”

Optimizing dual energy cone beam CT protocols for preclinical imaging and radiation research

“…Extracting the effective atomic number and relative electron density Z eff was extracted using the tissue substitute method described by Landry et al, 14 which is based on a parameterization of the ratio of high-and low-energy linear attenuation coefficients. …”