2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving land surface phenology indicators from CO2 eddy covariance measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
91
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further refer to length of season (LOS) as the land surface phenology season length or the photosynthesis phenology season length. For the extraction of phenological transition dates we used an objective method based on analytical formulas we derived from the extremes of the first, second and third derivatives of the fitted logistic functions (Gonsamo et al, 2013a). For GPP, GF and PI time series, SOS, SOP, EOP and EOS dates are derived as:…”
Section: Extraction Of Land Surface Phenology Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We further refer to length of season (LOS) as the land surface phenology season length or the photosynthesis phenology season length. For the extraction of phenological transition dates we used an objective method based on analytical formulas we derived from the extremes of the first, second and third derivatives of the fitted logistic functions (Gonsamo et al, 2013a). For GPP, GF and PI time series, SOS, SOP, EOP and EOS dates are derived as:…”
Section: Extraction Of Land Surface Phenology Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eddy covariance (EC) measurements of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere for numerous sites offers a spatially and temporally broad perspective for extracting photosynthesis phenological dates through gross primary productivity (GPP) (Garrity et al, 2011;Gonsamo et al, 2013aGonsamo et al, , 2012aNoormets et al, 2009;Richardson et al, 2010). The long-term availability of CO 2 flux measurements at EC tower sites now allows for comparison with remote sensing based LSP estimates over significant time periods and at a spatial footprint similar to coarse and medium resolution satellite pixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed by many researchers in the past [22,24,31,32] that different LSP-SOS derivation methods provide different results and therefore no single method can be claimed to best describe the phenology from satellite NDVI data. In this context Schwartz et al [26] notes, "though all (methods of LSP-SOS are) assessing the start of spring vegetation growth in some fashion, are effectively measuring different processes".…”
Section: Determination Of Satellite Start Of Season (Lsp-sos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delayed moving average [6,9,26,28] method used in this study is established from auto regressive moving average (ARMA) models that compare the NDVI time series with its moving average to determine the start of season. The derivatives, namely 1st [37][38][39], 2nd [38,40] and 3rd derivatives [32,38], determine the start of season as the date of the maximum increase in the respective NDVI derivative curve. As explained by Tan et al, 2011 [38], the local maxima of 1st derivative corresponds to the maximum rate of increase of green up phase, whereas, the local maxima of 2nd and 3rd derivative corresponds to the beginning of green up.…”
Section: Determination Of Satellite Start Of Season (Lsp-sos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, vegetation plays a role in impacting the carbon cycle, thus completing a "feedback loop" with the climate [8][9][10][11]. For this reason, the response of vegetation dynamics, for different land cover types, to precipitation and temperature anomalies is a subject of current climate research [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], aimed at understanding (and predicting) how the biosphere interacts with the atmosphere through the carbon, water and energy cycles [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%