1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35349-4_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving Presentations from Task Models

Abstract: Most task-based approaches have been used to analyse and design the dialogue part of interactive applications. There has been less focus on how a task model can be used to derive systematically indications for the design of the presentation of a user interface. This paper presents a solution to this problem which is based on identifying the sets of tasks that are active during the same period of time, and rules that take into account the semantics of the tasks considered and their relationships.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same statement holds for approaches that try to derive presentation details from task models, e.g. [13,16], although they provide high expressivity in describing the organization of work as well as rules for transforming that knowledge to user interface designs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The same statement holds for approaches that try to derive presentation details from task models, e.g. [13,16], although they provide high expressivity in describing the organization of work as well as rules for transforming that knowledge to user interface designs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The algorithm presented in [12] analyzes the hierarchy and the temporal operators of a task model to derive so-called Presentation Task Sets (PTS). A PTS contains all tasks that are enabled at the same time.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to MAD [22] and CTT [17,18], qualitative time is expressed using Lotos-like temporal operators while quantitative time is represented by expressing task duration (such as with CTT) and delay before tasks availability.…”
Section: Figure 2 Tasks Relationships In Hamstersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various notations (e.g. CTT [17,18], MAD [22]) for modelling tasks, ranging from very abstract (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%