2015 Ieee Autotestcon 2015
DOI: 10.1109/autest.2015.7356482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deriving prognostic continuous time Bayesian networks from D-matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A reliability analysis based on CTBN was developed by Boudali and Dugan (2006). More recently, a prognostics method based on CTBN was introduced to account for PHM sensors in a system (Perreault, Thornton, Strasser, & Sheppard, 2015). This method was applied to a system in order to predict faults and act on them to prevent system failure.…”
Section: Phm-potential Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A reliability analysis based on CTBN was developed by Boudali and Dugan (2006). More recently, a prognostics method based on CTBN was introduced to account for PHM sensors in a system (Perreault, Thornton, Strasser, & Sheppard, 2015). This method was applied to a system in order to predict faults and act on them to prevent system failure.…”
Section: Phm-potential Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each fault has exactly one intensity matrix as it has no parents; however, for tests, an intensity matrix is needed for each state of each fault it detects, giving an upper bound on time complexity of O(c m ) where c is the maximum number of states of the faults the test detects, and m is number of faults that the test detects. This demonstrates the importance of unit tests or tests that detect faults on a small number of components, (Perreault, Thornton, Strasser, & Sheppard, 2015). An example conversion of the D-matrix from Table 3 to CTBN is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Mapping a D-matrix To A Ctbnmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Creating a CTBN from a D-matrix is straightforward and capitalizes on the performance gains of the independent graphical model representation. Details of the conversion process can be found in (Perreault, Thornton, Strasser, & Sheppard, 2015). Other graphical model representations have similar performance gains, but since the fault events are also dependent on time with no time step appropriate for all faults, we believe the CTBN with its associated conditional CTMPs to be a more accurate representation.…”
Section: Mapping a D-matrix To A Ctbnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NoisyOR functions were used to determine Boolean variables as we preferred to quantify the effect of each causal factor on its parent node independently of considering all possible combinations of states of the other parents. The NoisyOR function simplifies the elicitation of complex conditional probability tables and soothes the presumption that a factor can be reported as a "True" state only when a parent is also in the "True" status ( Kyburg and Pearl, 1991 ; Perreault et al, 2016 ). This is demonstrated by introducing the 'leak' factor which suggests that there are other unknown parent variables (nodes).…”
Section: Bayesian Belief Network (Bbn)mentioning
confidence: 99%