1982
DOI: 10.1080/00362178285380101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dermatophyte prevalence in Wellington, New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest incidence of dermatophyte infection was observed in adults. In an earlier study from Wellington in 1982, T. rubrum was also the commonest isolate, but contributed only 35.8% of cases 5 . An increase in the incidence of T. rubrum over the last few decades has been reported in many countries, including Australia 1–4,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highest incidence of dermatophyte infection was observed in adults. In an earlier study from Wellington in 1982, T. rubrum was also the commonest isolate, but contributed only 35.8% of cases 5 . An increase in the incidence of T. rubrum over the last few decades has been reported in many countries, including Australia 1–4,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The pattern of infection varies depending on location, the strains of endemic dermatophytes, cultural habits and migration 1–4 . There have been several epidemiological reports of dermatophyte infections from different countries, but few from New Zealand or Australia 5,6 . Auckland is New Zealand's largest city, with a population of about 1.2 million persons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception in this respect is a report of Bridger (4) who showed in his investigations (conducted in southern New Zeeland) that T rubrum was less frequently the cause of feet dermatophytosis. Nevertheless, an analysis of other cases observed in Wellington (also in New Zeeland) by other authors, published in 1982, showed the growth of infections to be caused by I: rubrum (2 16, 17). The increase of certain species, and the continuing rarerity of others lacks a satisfactory explanation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The literature revealed that this fungus is relatively common, and is responsible for a 4-to-81% variation in worldwide dermatophytoses. [3][4][5][6][7][8] In Brazil, it appears to be responsible for dermatophytoses in the South, Central-West and Southeast regions (35-59%). [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The second most frequent species was T. tonsurans, which stood out previously as the prevalent species in the North and Northeast.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literatura revela que esse fungo é relativamente comum e responsável por variação de quatro a 81% das dermatofitoses mundiais. [3][4][5][6][7][8] No Brasil, aparece como responsável por dermatofitoses em estados das regiões Sul, Centro-Oeste e Sudeste (35-59%). [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] A segunda espécie mais freqüente, o T. tonsurans, já se destacou anteriormente como espécie prevalente 10,15,[17][18][19] nas regiões Norte e Nordeste.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified