2004
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-04-12534-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Descent Properties of Homotopy K-Theory

Abstract: In this paper, we show that the widely held expectation that Weibel's homotopy Ktheory satisfies cdh-descent is indeed fulfilled for schemes over a field of characteristic zero. The main ingredient in the proof is a certain factorization of the resolution of hypersurface singularities. Some consequences are derived. Finally, some evidence for a conjecture of Weibel concerning negative K-theory is given. Here a cdh K −q is the cdh-sheafification of the K-theory presheaf.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
64
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
64
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given V with singular locus Z, choose a resolution of singularities, V ′ → V , and set Z ′ = Z × V V ′ . By Haesemeyer [20], KH(V ; Z/q) satisfies cdh descent. It follows that we have a fibration sequence…”
Section: Algebraic K-theory Of Varieties Over R Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given V with singular locus Z, choose a resolution of singularities, V ′ → V , and set Z ′ = Z × V V ′ . By Haesemeyer [20], KH(V ; Z/q) satisfies cdh descent. It follows that we have a fibration sequence…”
Section: Algebraic K-theory Of Varieties Over R Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If X is a hypersurface inside some smooth F -scheme U , we can factor its resolution of singularities locally into a sequence of blow-ups along regular sequences and finite abstract blow-ups; using induction on the dimension of X and the length of the resolution, we conclude that E(X) ∼ = H cdh (X, E). (See [16,Th. 6.1] for details of the proof in the case where E = KH.)…”
Section: Descent For the Cdh-topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6.1] for details of the proof in the case where E = KH.) Next, if X is a local complete intersection, we use induction on the embedding codimension and Mayer-Vietoris for closed covers to prove that once again E(X) ∼ = H cdh (X, E) in this case (see [16,Corollary 6.2] for details). Finally, the general case follows from this because every integral F -scheme is locally a component of a complete intersection (see [16,Th.…”
Section: Descent For the Cdh-topologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, in order to apply the Guillén-Navarro descent theorem 2.1, we have to verify properties (F1) and (F2). The first one is immediate, while (F2) follows from Thomason's calculation in [T93,Théorème], of the algebraic K-theory of a blow up along a regularly immersed subscheme, as has been observed by many authors (see, for example, [H,Theorem 3.6], [GS,Theorem 5], or [CHSW,Remark 1.6…”
Section: Descent Algebraic K-theorymentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The homotopy limit spaces holimX n , n 0, in the sense of Bousfield-Kan, [BK, Chapter XI], define a fibrant spectrum holimX; see [T80, 5.6]. In fact, one can see that PreSp has a structure of a simplicial closed model category (see [S,Proposition 2.1.5]) so that we can apply the general theory of homotopy limits for these categories [H,Chapter 18].…”
Section: Homotopy Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%