2018
DOI: 10.1590/0100-29452018949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Description of the growth of pequi fruits by nonlinear models

Abstract: Descrição do crescimento de frutos de pequizeiro por modelos não linearesResumo -O pequizeiro é uma espécie nativa do cerrado brasileiro, com ampla distribuição geográfica, cujo fruto é bastante apreciado na culinária, compondo pratos tradicionais. Em geral, o fruto do pequi é consumido quando maduro, na forma in natura ou nos diversos, produtos derivados tais como óleos, licores, doces, sorvetes, entre outros, envolvendo importante atividade socioeconômica geradora de emprego e renda na agricultura familiar. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have used these models to describe plant and fruit growth (MUIANGA et al, 2016;PEREIRA et al, 2016;RIBEIRO et al, 2018a;RIBEIRO et al, 2018b). The most frequently used models for sugarcane are the Logistic and Gompertz models, commonly adjusted for stalk growth (SILVA et al, 2012;BATISTA et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have used these models to describe plant and fruit growth (MUIANGA et al, 2016;PEREIRA et al, 2016;RIBEIRO et al, 2018a;RIBEIRO et al, 2018b). The most frequently used models for sugarcane are the Logistic and Gompertz models, commonly adjusted for stalk growth (SILVA et al, 2012;BATISTA et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests applied to check the assumptions of the regression models: Shapiro-Wilk, to check the assumption of error normality; Breusch-Pagan, to test the hypothesis that the errors are homoscedastic and the Durbin-Watson test, to check the independence of the errors. When the Durbin-Watson test rejected the null hypothesis that the experimental errors were independent, the model errors were considered as follows: ε t = ϕε t-1 + λ t , at which ϕ is the first-order autocorrelation parameter AR(1) and λ t is white noise (MORETTIN;TOLOI, 2006;MUNIZ, 2007;SOUSA et al, 2014;MUIANGA et al, 2016;RIBEIRO et al, 2018a;JANE, et al, 2020;PRADO et al, 2020). In cases in which the assumption of normality was met, the confidence interval was estimated with a 95% probability for the model parameters based on the expression:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the rate of 30.0 m 3 ha -1 , Cabrera was the model that best described the carbon mineralization, presenting the lowest AIC and the highest R 2 aj , followed by the Stanford and Smith model and Juma model. Source: Elaborated by the authors (2019).…”
Section: Stanford and Smith Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitted model for carbon mineralization (mg of CO 2 kg -1 ) as a function of time of incubation, at the rate of 15.0 m 3 ha -1 of pig slurry.Source: Elaborated by the authors(2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%