2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-05362011000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho de quatro cultivares de morangueiro em duas regiões ecoclimáticas do Rio Grande do Sul

Abstract: A escolha das cultivares possui importância relevante para alcançar o sucesso no cultivo do morangueiro. No entanto, as pesquisas com cultivares, normalmente ocorrem em sistemas convencionais de produção e não em sistemas de cultivo sem solo. Em função disso, avaliaram-se quatro cultivares de morangueiro em sistema sem solo, em casas de vegetação, em duas localidades, com condições ecoclimáticas diferentes, em Eldorado do Sul (Depressão Central) e Caxias do Sul (Serra do Nordeste), no RS. Foram estudadas as cu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
14
2
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
14
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Cruz et al (2012), a coefficient of experimental variation estimates (CV) below 20% denotes a high level of experimental precision for phenotypic traits with continuous distribution. The value obtained from this study (CV = 19.26%) thus indicates reliable results, and corresponds with observed results for this trait as noted in other strawberry crop studies (Radmann et al, 2006;Moncada et al, 2008;Resende et al, 2010;Randin et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2015). *Significant at 1% probability by the F test.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Cruz et al (2012), a coefficient of experimental variation estimates (CV) below 20% denotes a high level of experimental precision for phenotypic traits with continuous distribution. The value obtained from this study (CV = 19.26%) thus indicates reliable results, and corresponds with observed results for this trait as noted in other strawberry crop studies (Radmann et al, 2006;Moncada et al, 2008;Resende et al, 2010;Randin et al, 2011;Costa et al, 2015). *Significant at 1% probability by the F test.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, Camarosa is indicated as the closest surveyed genotype to the ideal model for production within the evaluated environments. These results correspond to those reported by Resende et al (2010) and Randin et al (2011), which verified that this genotype results in high productivity yields in three cultivation environments evaluated in the State of Paraná and in two locations surveyed in Rio Grande do Sul, respectively. In sum, based on the results obtained from the two methods used in this study to investigate the G x A x L interaction, we recommend growing the Camarosa genotype for production at the three locations assessed due to the high frequency of favorable alleles, which were expressed in all localities evaluated regardless of agricultural year.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to mention that the estimates of coefficient of variation obtained were lower than 15% for all traits, indicating high experimental precision and credibility of the joint analysis. Estimates of coefficient of variation observed in the joint analysis are similar to those reported in other strawberry studies (RADMANN et al, 2006;MONCADA et al, 2008;RESENDE et al, 2010;RANDIN et al, 2011;COSTA et al, 2015;COSTA et al, 2016). According to Cruz et al (2012), coefficient of variation lower than 20% indicates high experimental precision for quantitative traits, such as those evaluated in this study.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The number of commercial fruits (NCF) of the Camarosa cultivar was higher to those reported by Radin et al, (2011), whom evaluated the number of fruits per plant of four cultivars. They found, on average, a value of 15.6 and 20.0 fruits for the Camarosa cultivar, this difference may be related to the local temperature differences and also to the genotype used.…”
Section: Variables Productioncontrasting
confidence: 62%