1998
DOI: 10.1007/s003600050127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desiccation resistance and water balance in southern African keratin beetles (Coleoptera, Trogidae): the influence of body size and habitat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, metabolic rate was retained as a significant term (partial correlation t=4.3, P<0.05). Indeed, although larger body size has frequently been identified as an important means by which insects in general (Schoener and Janzen, 1968;Remmert, 1981;Lighton et al, 1994;Le Lagadec et al, 1998; but see also Gibbs and Matzkin, 2001;Chown and Klok, 2003;Gibbs et al, 2003), and dung beetles in particular (Chown et al, 1995), might alter their responses to environmental water availability, it did not enter most of our models as a significant term. Clearly, both cuticular and spiracular water loss rates scale with body mass, but, especially in the latter case, body mass is much less important in explaining variation than are other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…That is, metabolic rate was retained as a significant term (partial correlation t=4.3, P<0.05). Indeed, although larger body size has frequently been identified as an important means by which insects in general (Schoener and Janzen, 1968;Remmert, 1981;Lighton et al, 1994;Le Lagadec et al, 1998; but see also Gibbs and Matzkin, 2001;Chown and Klok, 2003;Gibbs et al, 2003), and dung beetles in particular (Chown et al, 1995), might alter their responses to environmental water availability, it did not enter most of our models as a significant term. Clearly, both cuticular and spiracular water loss rates scale with body mass, but, especially in the latter case, body mass is much less important in explaining variation than are other factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is also interesting that adult A. diaperinus cannot survive on a dry diet, unlike some other insects (Naidu & Hattingh, 1988;Scholtz & Caveney, 1988). The utilization of lipid catabolism as a means to provide a source of water, as found in keratin beetles (Le Lagadec et al, 1998), may be limited in A. diaperinus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight, but not significant, slower rate of water loss in females is likely to be related to their larger body size and may contribute to the better survival of females. Moreover, larger insects could tolerate greater water losses than smaller ones because of the higher amount of water that can be lost (Le Lagadec et al, 1998).…”
Section: Importance Of Sex and Body Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the rate measured at the interval prior to dead). To correct the analyses for the individual variation in mass and water status and to account for potential sex-specific differences in the response variables (see Chown and Nicolson, 2004;Le Lagadec et al, 1998), initial M s and sex were included as covariates, plus WC s in the analysis of WLRs. In this case, as M s and WC s are highly correlated, their effects were evaluated separately to avoid statistical problems of collinearity between predictors.…”
Section: Effect Of Salinity On Desiccation Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%