2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101168
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and additive manufacturing of closed cells from supportless lattice structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows the stress–strain curves of the tests for different lattice structure specimens. To evaluate these structures’ mechanical properties and the energy absorption ability of different lattice structures, we obtained these quantities with the following equations [ 27 ]: where is the relative density of the lattice structure, is the density of the lattice structure in g/cm 3 , is the density of PEEK (1.29 g/cm 3 ), is the compressive modulus in MPa, is the yield stress in MPa obtained at 0.02 of strain (linear part of the stress–strain curve), and is the energy absorption per unit volume calculated by numerically integrating the stress–strain curves up to the strain of 0.4 due to the absence of stabilized densification ( Figure 5 ) [ 27 ]. The energy absorption per unit volume of different lattice structures offers useful insight for application of these structures in impact and energy absorption applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows the stress–strain curves of the tests for different lattice structure specimens. To evaluate these structures’ mechanical properties and the energy absorption ability of different lattice structures, we obtained these quantities with the following equations [ 27 ]: where is the relative density of the lattice structure, is the density of the lattice structure in g/cm 3 , is the density of PEEK (1.29 g/cm 3 ), is the compressive modulus in MPa, is the yield stress in MPa obtained at 0.02 of strain (linear part of the stress–strain curve), and is the energy absorption per unit volume calculated by numerically integrating the stress–strain curves up to the strain of 0.4 due to the absence of stabilized densification ( Figure 5 ) [ 27 ]. The energy absorption per unit volume of different lattice structures offers useful insight for application of these structures in impact and energy absorption applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support removal, powder removal, or resin removal (under the primary post-processing category) are important post-processing steps in additive manufacturing which usually consume considerable time. To address this, Ajeet et al designed and additively manufactured a bio-inspired supportless-lattice structure with the MEX process, which has eliminated the support required during fabrication, resulting in high-speed additive manufacturing with less time in support-removal post-processing [106,107]. In general, post-processing is done after 3D printing to enhance the properties of the part/object [108,109].…”
Section: Post-processing Techniques For 3d-printed Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As said, these lattice structures are designed for supportless printing, eliminating the needs for support material within the lattice, that is an undoubted advantage 8 . Hence, also a closed cell lattice structure can be additively manufactured with the design concept of the supportless lattice structure 9 …”
Section: Additive Manufacturing Of Latticesmentioning
confidence: 99%