2021
DOI: 10.11591/ijpeds.v12.i1.pp51-58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and analysis of double stator HE-FSM for aircraft applications

Abstract: The main objective of aerospace industry is to produce all electric aircraft (AEA) equipped by electrical devices in coming developments. Electrical machines that provide higher torque densities are gaining more interest for researchers to obtain sustainable direct-drive electrical propulsion system for aircraft applications. In addition to lesser weight and higher torque density, a machine should be “fault tolerant” to applied in aerospace applications. A novel machine for high starting torque, identified as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant flux in Figure 3 and Figure 4 depicts the operating principle, where the rotating motion and the flux interaction create angle shifting. The resulting flux of MSOR FSPM in Figure 3 shows a sinusoidal phase shift of angle -8° while SS-HESRM is precisely at the correct angle [22]. The graph verifies that the maximum resultant flux of MSOR FSPM is 0.021 Wb which is lower than the AC flux only by 0.031 Wb.…”
Section: A Flux Interaction Between Pm and Armature Coilmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The resultant flux in Figure 3 and Figure 4 depicts the operating principle, where the rotating motion and the flux interaction create angle shifting. The resulting flux of MSOR FSPM in Figure 3 shows a sinusoidal phase shift of angle -8° while SS-HESRM is precisely at the correct angle [22]. The graph verifies that the maximum resultant flux of MSOR FSPM is 0.021 Wb which is lower than the AC flux only by 0.031 Wb.…”
Section: A Flux Interaction Between Pm and Armature Coilmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…At higher frequencies the matched Sziklai pair device current gain is β 2 whereas for unmatched Sziklai pair it is β 1 × β 2 [12]. The lower quiescent current makes Sziklai pair thermally stable than Darlington pair and also shows better linearity [13]. This paper covers detailed analysis of NPN Sziklai pair small-signal amplifiers under CE and CC configurations with matched pair of BJTs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%