2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and development of capacitance based moisture measurement for grains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two methods, direct and indirect, for measuring the moisture content [ 4 , 5 ]. The direct method can be divided into the drying method and chemical method, but it has the disadvantage that it is time-consuming and inefficient [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two methods, direct and indirect, for measuring the moisture content [ 4 , 5 ]. The direct method can be divided into the drying method and chemical method, but it has the disadvantage that it is time-consuming and inefficient [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study, Mohan et al [19] proposed a novel approach using capacitive sensors to nondestructively inspect the integrity of food containers. Tinna et al [20] showcased the use of capacitive sensors in determining the moisture content of grains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tinna et al. [ 20 ] showcased the use of capacitive sensors in determining the moisture content of grains. When compared to traditional impedance measurement methods, these innovative techniques demonstrated their reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, grain moisture detection methods are divided into offline detection and online detection methods [11]. Offline detection [12] involves removing the water in grain after the test sample is taken from production and processing and calculating the moisture content of the grain through drying or chemical methods, such as the 105 constant weight method [13] and Karl Fischer method [14]. This type of detection is generally used as the comparison standard for detection accuracy but is not practical in the actual production process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%