2020
DOI: 10.1002/bem.22256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Dosimetric Analysis of an Exposure Facility for Investigating Possible Effects of 2.45 GHz Wi‐Fi Signals on Human Sleep

Abstract: A new head exposure system for double‐blind provocation studies investigating possible effects of 2.45 GHz Wi‐Fi exposure on human sleep was developed and dosimetrically analyzed. The exposure system includes six simultaneously radiating directional antennas arranged along a circle (radius 0.6 m) around the test subject's head, and enables a virtually uniform head exposure, i.e. without any preferred direction of incidence, during sleep. The system is fully computer‐controlled and applies a real wireless local… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A specially designed Wi‐Fi exposure system was used on the experimental nights (for more detailed information, see Appendix Exposure system and Schmid et al., 2020). In the Wi‐Fi condition, participants were exposed to wireless local area network signals at a carrier frequency of 2.45 GHz (peak spatial specific absorption rate psSAR 10g = <25 mW/kg maximum or <6.4 mW/kg for an average over 6 min); in the sham exposure condition, no exposure was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specially designed Wi‐Fi exposure system was used on the experimental nights (for more detailed information, see Appendix Exposure system and Schmid et al., 2020). In the Wi‐Fi condition, participants were exposed to wireless local area network signals at a carrier frequency of 2.45 GHz (peak spatial specific absorption rate psSAR 10g = <25 mW/kg maximum or <6.4 mW/kg for an average over 6 min); in the sham exposure condition, no exposure was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%