2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and engineering of tumor-targeted, dual-acting cytotoxic nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it must be noted that T22, in form of different types of protein-only nanoparticles (including GFP, BFP or iRFP) has been never observed as inducer of cell toxicity or apoptosis in cell culture or in vivo, in different animal models of human cancers [16,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. However, the use of T22-based vehicles to deliver small cytotoxic drugs [17,52,53] or proteins [24,40,45,48,54] result in highly selective tumor tissue destruction. These consistent observations confirm that in the biparatopic materials EPI-X4 is associated to cell toxicity while T22 to enhanced targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it must be noted that T22, in form of different types of protein-only nanoparticles (including GFP, BFP or iRFP) has been never observed as inducer of cell toxicity or apoptosis in cell culture or in vivo, in different animal models of human cancers [16,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. However, the use of T22-based vehicles to deliver small cytotoxic drugs [17,52,53] or proteins [24,40,45,48,54] result in highly selective tumor tissue destruction. These consistent observations confirm that in the biparatopic materials EPI-X4 is associated to cell toxicity while T22 to enhanced targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While nanocarriers improve the drug biodistribution and passive and active targeting, reduce renal clearance, protect the drug from degradation, and enhance cell uptake, only a fraction of the administered drug reaches the tumor tissue. Further, the persistence of the carrier in the tumor and healthy tissues leads to undesired toxic effects [ 94 , 95 ]. NPs based on multifunctional proteins that are degraded by natural enzymatic pathways are attractive as a carrier for passive or active drug targeting to tumors [ 96 ].…”
Section: Self-assembling Protein Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T22 peptide facilitated the binding and internalization of the NPs in CXCR4 + tumor cells for targeted intracellular drug delivery. In a recent study, the drugs, oligo-floxuridine (FdU) and monomethyl auristatine E (MMAE), were chemically coupled to exotoxin A from Pseudomonase aeruginosa and diphtheria toxin from Corynebacterium diphtheria, respectively, to form self-assembled protein NPs with an average size of 50 nm targeting CXCR4 + tumor cells [ 95 ]. Based on in vitro studies, the resulting protein NPs were internalized by CXCR4 + cells and inhibited the growth of tumor cells.…”
Section: Self-assembling Protein Npsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several structural variants of polyphemusin peptides have been tested for antimicrobial properties [24,25], T22 has been never explored in this regard. Considering the growing need for new antimicrobial agents and the proved clinical potential of T22 in cell-targeted drug delivery [11,18,29], the detection of any new antimicrobial activities in this peptide would be of broad interest and deserves a thorough investigation. More so, these functionalities might be conserved in T22 peptides displayed on multimeric protein nanoparticles, since antimicrobial activities largely benefit from nanostructured and multivalent presentations [30,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%