2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and evaluation of a parametric model for cardiac sounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously evaluated several time-frequency dictionaries to decompose the PCG, showing that Gabor wavelets accurately represent this signal [71] . For the experiments conducted in this research, the selected number of atoms was M a =15 in order to reach almost 99 % of the energy to reconstruct a PCG cycle.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have previously evaluated several time-frequency dictionaries to decompose the PCG, showing that Gabor wavelets accurately represent this signal [71] . For the experiments conducted in this research, the selected number of atoms was M a =15 in order to reach almost 99 % of the energy to reconstruct a PCG cycle.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we selected the RF method for its simplicity and high performance [69] . The main reason to use MP+LPC as features stems from the heart sound reconstruction model we have previously proposed [71] . This sparse We suppose that this fact results from the higher diversity produced when taking the mean value of the features rather than the direct calculation of the features from a single averaged cycle.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work we showed that this representation of the residual preserves some meaningful heart sound signal components. 37 • We considered two main approaches to build and extract PCG signal feature sets: feature averaging and cycle averaging. Most of Physionet challenge submissions focused on the first one, while the second one had not been evaluated with these recordings so far.…”
Section: Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in heart sounds that correspond to different heart disease symptoms are extremely difficult to distinguish. In detail, changes in heart sounds to detect heart diseases are too small so that it is difficult to perform proper diagnosis [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%