2018
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2810887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Evaluation of a Wearable Haptic Device for Skin Stretch, Pressure, and Vibrotactile Stimuli

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a wearable haptic device for the forearm and its application in robotic teleoperation. The device is able to provide skin stretch, pressure, and vibrotactile stimuli. Two servo motors, housed in a 3D printed lightweight platform, actuate an elastic fabric belt, wrapped around the arm. When the two servo motors rotate in opposite directions, the belt is tightened (or loosened), thereby compressing (or decompressing) the arm. On the other hand, when the two motors rotate in the same … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this point, we are studying new ways of providing guidance information to the operators using only ungrounded haptic stimuli, with the objective of providing the users with information about what the controller thinks they should do, but without reducing their capabilities to control the motion of the robot. A possible approach is to employ a wearable device instead of the grounded Virtuose interface, as done in [27]- [29]. This point is important in our target scenarios, where it is paramount to value the knowledge and experience of our operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this point, we are studying new ways of providing guidance information to the operators using only ungrounded haptic stimuli, with the objective of providing the users with information about what the controller thinks they should do, but without reducing their capabilities to control the motion of the robot. A possible approach is to employ a wearable device instead of the grounded Virtuose interface, as done in [27]- [29]. This point is important in our target scenarios, where it is paramount to value the knowledge and experience of our operators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alonzo et al proposed stacking vibrotactile stimulators on top of electrotactile stimulators to make the system more compact [36]. Another wearable haptic device could deliver skin-stretch, pressure, and vibrotactile to convey information about the status of the teleoperated robot and it has been shown to effectively improve the user operation performance [37]. Skin stretch is a natural sensing mode for proprioception, thus making it ideal to intuitively convey proprioceptive information to the user [25], even when compared to vibrotactile feedback [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we will study more in detail the effect of vibrotactile stimuli in AR, and we will consider haptic devices for the wrist and arm (e.g., [27], [28]). Finally, we intend to better investigate the role of sensory substitution of visual feedback, combining visual and haptic information together to achieve higher performance.…”
Section: ) Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%