2017
DOI: 10.22211/cejem/77612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Evaluation of the Thermal Properties of Di-, Tri- and Tetra-Azido-Esters

Abstract: A group of polycyclic and aliphatic azido-esters (as energetic plasticizers) have been synthesized by simple synthetic routes and their molecular structures were confirmed by spectroscopic techniques. In addition, their thermal and rheological properties have been determined utilizing DSC, TGA, viscosity, and contact angle. Computational studies of these plasticizers have been performed by means of DFT (B3LYP/6-31G*) to estimate possible stable structures, energies, heat of formation, bond dissociation energie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT BANFHOB has a significantly higher oxygen balance value (-78.6%) than DBP (-224.2%) and most reported azido plasticizers [35][36][37][38][39]. This is due to its high fluorine content (49.4 wt%), which contributes substantially to its oxidizing capability.…”
Section: Energetic and Physicochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT BANFHOB has a significantly higher oxygen balance value (-78.6%) than DBP (-224.2%) and most reported azido plasticizers [35][36][37][38][39]. This is due to its high fluorine content (49.4 wt%), which contributes substantially to its oxidizing capability.…”
Section: Energetic and Physicochemical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inert (non‐energetic) and energetic plasticizers are all used in propellant formulation . However, inert plasticizers have the disadvantage of reducing the energy output of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4] Inert (non-energetic) and energetic plasticizers are all used in propellant formulation. [5] However, inert plasticizers have the disadvantage of reducing the energy output of the system. Energetic plasticizers (EPs) are often preferred to inert plasticizers because EPs perform a dual task: retaining reasonable sensitivity, suppressing chemical reactivity, and ensuring a high thermal stability as one approaches oxygen balanced materials, creating the densest material possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%