2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.3702581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and modeling of InAs/GaSb type II superlattice based dual-band infrared detectors

Abstract: The objective of this paper is to provide a credible analysis for predicting the spectral responsivity of InAs/GaSb/AlSb type-II superlattice (T2SL) based dual-band infrared photodetectors. An overview of the T2SL based design criteria is given and new dual-band detector architecture with a model dual-band detector structure designed to detect light in the mid-wave infrared (MWIR) and long-wave infrared (LWIR) ranges is presented. The absorption coefficient is modeled empirically and the quantum efficiency spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated in Figures 4 and 6, the effective bandgap is determined by the difference between the bottom of the lowest electron miniband (C1) and the top of the highest hole miniband (HH1) and it has the value of 0.13 eV, which is in excellent agreement with the one experimentally reported by [48] and theoretically with the absorption spectrum reported in Figure 8. This effective gap can be tuned by changing the layer thickness and is primarily determined by the position of the C1 bottom edge since the HH1 band width is less sensitive to layer thickness [49]. The HH1 band width is too small which might be interpreted as it experiences a balanced effect between higher and lower bands.…”
Section: Parabolicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in Figures 4 and 6, the effective bandgap is determined by the difference between the bottom of the lowest electron miniband (C1) and the top of the highest hole miniband (HH1) and it has the value of 0.13 eV, which is in excellent agreement with the one experimentally reported by [48] and theoretically with the absorption spectrum reported in Figure 8. This effective gap can be tuned by changing the layer thickness and is primarily determined by the position of the C1 bottom edge since the HH1 band width is less sensitive to layer thickness [49]. The HH1 band width is too small which might be interpreted as it experiences a balanced effect between higher and lower bands.…”
Section: Parabolicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The working mechanism is similar to that of the dualband detector which was mentioned in Ref. [14]. The optical characterization of the front-side illuminated detector was performed at 77 K using a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Bruker Vertex70) and a calibrated black-body (SYSTEMS) source at a temperature of 500 • C. The FTIR spectrometer was calibrated by using a standard DTGS detector without anti-reflection (AR) coating.…”
Section: Spectral Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dual-band infrared (IR) focal plane array (FPA) detectors capable of imaging simultaneously in two wavebands have matured dramatically in the last decade [1]- [5]. Because the thermal signatures of objects and backgrounds are wavelength dependent, this technology can in theory be used to improve target detection, tracking, and clutter rejection performance in a variety of important applications [6]- [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%