2022
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2022.3182880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Optimization of a Multimode Amphibious Robot With Propeller-Leg

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The switching system in the form of (10) can represent a wide range of engineering systems, including loading robots 41 and amphibious robots 42 …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The switching system in the form of (10) can represent a wide range of engineering systems, including loading robots 41 and amphibious robots 42 …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robot equipped with propeller-legs on SWGM ground. The propeller-leg is a kind of propulsion device that was introduced in our previous study [32] for the amphibious robot. Three arc-shaped legs are evenly distributed on a circle with a radius of 110 mm, and the arc is 0.5 rad.…”
Section: Test For Propeller-leg In Swgmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the comparative experiment of the robot running on the ground of GM and SWGM proves the force law in this paper. Specific information about the robot is explained in our previous study [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 1,38–42 ] Such robots should be developed to combine the performances of conventional XYθ ‐axis precision stages using ball screws with a maximum speed of around 10 mm s −1 with a repeatability of 0.5 μm, [ 43–45 ] and precise piezoelectric stages with a resolution of 1 nm within the range of around 0.2 mm. [ 46–50 ] Among these, some nonholonomic mobile robots incorporating piezoelectric elements [ 51–54 ] exhibit remarkable performance, including high speed and excellent mobility across challenging terrain. However, their suitability for precision tasks in confined spaces is limited due to their restricted mobility, stemming from their nonholonomic nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%