2010
DOI: 10.1109/tce.2010.5606256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and performance analysis of a low complexity digital clock recovery algorithm for software-defined radio applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of some parallel challenging SDR blocks like symbol synchronization on an FPGA can significantly reduce the performance requirements on a personal computer. The analysis of the resource utilization by authors in [14] and [15] for their symbol timing system confirmed too that more than one quarter of dedicated multipliers is necessary for RTL synthesis on FPGA. The presented synchronization system was compared with a conventional synchronization system, where a Farrow structure [11] is used to implement the time-varying fractional delay, FIR filter.…”
Section: Fpga Synthesismentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation of some parallel challenging SDR blocks like symbol synchronization on an FPGA can significantly reduce the performance requirements on a personal computer. The analysis of the resource utilization by authors in [14] and [15] for their symbol timing system confirmed too that more than one quarter of dedicated multipliers is necessary for RTL synthesis on FPGA. The presented synchronization system was compared with a conventional synchronization system, where a Farrow structure [11] is used to implement the time-varying fractional delay, FIR filter.…”
Section: Fpga Synthesismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…General division in (14) has to be eliminated for fast fixed-point implementation and optimal VHDL synthesis on the FPGA. We can recognize that 1/N T I /T s [11].…”
Section: Interpolation Control Blockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of removing these frequency components in this manner is that no bandpass filter (or PLL) is required, which reduces the cost of implementing this estimator. In previous implementations of SL algorithms that use an integrator and a band-pass filter [10], [11], the output of the integrator before and after a dump was shown to be significantly different, leading to discontinuity in the signal. This discontinuity was shown to impact the recovered clock signal after band-pass filter operation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When making a noise-tolerant implementation of an SL-based algorithm, more resources are required for averaging as the targeted noise level increases. The averaging processes included in SL algorithms remove a significant level of unwanted harmonics using one of the following: a phaselocked loop (PLL) [1], a narrowband-pass filter [1], or a combination of an integrator and a relaxed shape band-pass filter Manuscript [10], [11]. Here, we use only a customized integrator to remove the most disruptive harmonics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors in [17] have evaluated the variance of jitter in SLN synchroniser, stating that this estimator has the best performance over other feedforward algorithms. Several blind estimators are introduced and evaluated in [18, 19]. In [20–24] the timing estimators are used in digital coherent optical receivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%