Handbook of Groundwater Remediation Using Permeable Reactive Barriers 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012513563-4/50017-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Performance of a Permeable Reactive Barrier for Containment of Uranium, Arsenic, Selenium, Vanadium, Molybdenum, and Nitrate at Monticello, Utah

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The production of reduced U ore deposits is simply a special case of the general process of subsurface reduction of aqueous U: this effect could be expected to occur in other groundwater systems where U is being reduced. If this is revealed to be the case, then observations of U fractionation could serve as an indicator of U reduction not only for ore deposits, but also for remediation efforts such as in situ biostimulation (Anderson et al, 2003), or reducing walls (e.g., Morrison et al, 2002). Measurements of δ 238 U would provide a tool for assessing U reduction independent of complications such as sorption and dilution on August 20, 2015 geology.gsapubs.org Downloaded from effects, which inhibit accurate remediation assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The production of reduced U ore deposits is simply a special case of the general process of subsurface reduction of aqueous U: this effect could be expected to occur in other groundwater systems where U is being reduced. If this is revealed to be the case, then observations of U fractionation could serve as an indicator of U reduction not only for ore deposits, but also for remediation efforts such as in situ biostimulation (Anderson et al, 2003), or reducing walls (e.g., Morrison et al, 2002). Measurements of δ 238 U would provide a tool for assessing U reduction independent of complications such as sorption and dilution on August 20, 2015 geology.gsapubs.org Downloaded from effects, which inhibit accurate remediation assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our 222 Rn tracer test case was conducted at the site of the former uranium and vanadium ore‐processing mill located about 1 mile south of Monticello, Utah, previously described by Morrison et al (2002). At this site, uranium‐contaminated ground water in a shallow alluvial aquifer is intercepted by the 31.4‐m‐long PRB (Figure 2).…”
Section: Rn Tracer Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrosion coatings were reported to be predominantly hematite [␣-Fe 2 O 3 ] and magnetite, both of which were also present in the unused iron, and minor aragonite and marcasite [FeS 2 ], neither of which was detected in the unused iron (Sass et al 1998). Calcite with compositions ranging from near end-member to 50 at.% Fe, and ferrihydrite [nominally 5Fe 2 O 3 •9H 2 O] were identifi ed as precipitates in a PRB at Durango, Colorado (Morrison et al 2002). Cores from Fe 0 PRBs that had operated for about four years at Elizabeth City, North Carolina (treating chlorinated hydrocarbons), and at the Denver Federal Center, Lakewood, Colorado (treating Cr 6+ and chlorinated hydrocarbons), were reported by Furukawa et al (2002) and Wilkin et al (2003) to contain ferrihydrite, lepidocrocite [␥-FeOOH], goethite, magnetite, hematite, aragonite, calcite, Fe monosulfi de, mackinawite, greigite, pyrite, carbonate green rust, Fe 2 CO 3 (OH) 2 and siderite.…”
Section: Previous Mineralogical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%