2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2014
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2014.6836372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and scientific return of a miniaturized particle telescope onboard the Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE) CubeSat

Abstract: The Relativistic Electron and Proton Telescope Integrated Little Experiment (REPTile) is a loaded-disc collimated solid-state particle telescope designed, built, tested, and operated by a team of students at the University of Colorado. It was launched onboard the Colorado Student Space Weather Experiment (CSSWE), a 3U CubeSat, from Vandenberg Air Force Base on September 13th, 2012, as part of NASA's Educational Launch of Nanosatellites (ELaNa) program.REPTile takes measurements of energetic particles in the ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSSWE is a LEO CubeSat designed, built, and operated by students at University of Colorado Boulder with close mentorship from professionals and was deployed into orbit on 13 September 2012 with an inclination of 65° and 480 km × 790 km altitude [ Li et al , , ]. The sole science instrument onboard CSSWE is the Relativistic Electron and Proton Telescope integrated little experiment (REPTile), which measures the electron and proton flux with a time resolution of 6 s. REPTile uses the energy deposit (threshold) of each particle to determine the species and uses the penetration depth to determine the energy of the particle [ Schiller and Mahendrakumar , ; Blum and Schiller , ; Li et al , ; Schiller et al , ]. REPTile has three energy channels for both electrons and protons: 0.58–1.63 MeV, 1.63–3.8 MeV, and >3.8 MeV for electrons (referred to as the first, second, and third channels hereinafter) and 9–18 MeV, 18–30 MeV, and 30–40 MeV for protons.…”
Section: Observation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSSWE is a LEO CubeSat designed, built, and operated by students at University of Colorado Boulder with close mentorship from professionals and was deployed into orbit on 13 September 2012 with an inclination of 65° and 480 km × 790 km altitude [ Li et al , , ]. The sole science instrument onboard CSSWE is the Relativistic Electron and Proton Telescope integrated little experiment (REPTile), which measures the electron and proton flux with a time resolution of 6 s. REPTile uses the energy deposit (threshold) of each particle to determine the species and uses the penetration depth to determine the energy of the particle [ Schiller and Mahendrakumar , ; Blum and Schiller , ; Li et al , ; Schiller et al , ]. REPTile has three energy channels for both electrons and protons: 0.58–1.63 MeV, 1.63–3.8 MeV, and >3.8 MeV for electrons (referred to as the first, second, and third channels hereinafter) and 9–18 MeV, 18–30 MeV, and 30–40 MeV for protons.…”
Section: Observation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the depth of penetration into the stack, and the energy deposited in each detector, the measurements are binned into three electron energy channels (E1 = 0.58–1.63 MeV, E2 = 1.63–3.8 MeV, and E3 ≥ 3.8 MeV). Due to the strong scattering of energetic electrons in the detector materials, some fraction of the electrons below 1.63 MeV will impact the second detector and trigger the second energy channel E2 [e.g., Schiller et al , , Figure 3]. This is typically corrected for in the data processing by assuming a power law spectrum (see Li et al [] for details).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CubeSat technologies and capabilities are now sufficiently mature to enable peer-review-journal quality science missions. This was clearly proven with the CSSWE CubeSat, which has 17 such articles to date [1,2,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%