“…In such plants, a linear fixed receiver is suspended above a solar field composed by strips of mirrors, flat or slightly concentrating; each strip rotates on a fixed horizontal axis in order to reflect the sun radiation towards the receiver. Several studies have been devoted to plant configurations (Abbas et al, 2013;Grena and Tarquini, 2011;Häberle et al, 2002;Mills and Morrison, 2000;Zhu and Huang, 2014), study and simulation of various aspects of the plant work MunozAnton et al, 2014;Pino et al, 2013;Velazquez et al, 2010;Zheng et al, 2014), analysis of different types of receivers Facao and Oliveira, 2011;Lin et al, 2013;Natarajan et al, 2012;Singh et al, 2010), or comparisons with linear trough systems (Giostri et al, 2013;Morin et al, 2012;Schenk et al, 2014); prototypes have been proposed and built (Areva, 2015;Bernhard et al, 2008Bernhard et al, , 2009Novatec Solar, 2015;Solar Power Group, 2015). The main advantages with respect to trough systems are the fixed receiver, the larger collection area for each receiver (which reduces the cost of the receivers and simplifies the management of the fluid circulation), the small moving parts (mirrors are far smaller than the single-block mirror of a solar trough) and the lower cost of optical components (mirrors are almost flat, and their construction is simpler).…”