2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and Validation of an Instrument for Evaluating Training and Education for Health and Proper Use of Vaccines “VACUNASEDUCA”

Abstract: The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the design and validation of a questionnaire, to study the importance of vaccines in the health of children. It is based on the analysis of a complete conceptual framework, considering the factors that show the current situation of vaccines, in the context of education for health and coexistence on the international scene. One thousand subjects from 76 countries participated in the study. The validity of the questionnaire was carried out with 15 experts, resulting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative content validity was calculated using the content validity ratio (CVR) formula and compared to the numbers in the Lawshe table. The minimum CVR value was 0.62 (42,43). Since all items exceeded this value, no items were eliminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative content validity was calculated using the content validity ratio (CVR) formula and compared to the numbers in the Lawshe table. The minimum CVR value was 0.62 (42,43). Since all items exceeded this value, no items were eliminated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection was carried out by means of the survey technique, using the VACUNASEDUCA questionnaire [ 30 ], which was developed ad hoc and designed to know the perception about of the importance, awareness, and mandatory nature of vaccines in the health of the child population in certain social sectors. The questionnaire consists of 12 items with a Likert scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum appropriate CVR value considering the number of experts in this study is.51. [ 27 28 ] No items were removed since all items had a CVR of higher than.51. The overall CVI for CYRM-R is more efficient than the individual CVR report in most cases; hence, the total CVI was also calculated.…”
Section: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (Sdq)mentioning
confidence: 99%