Microstructure Sensitive Design for Performance Optimization 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-396989-7.00010-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for Performance Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
123
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
123
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For discrete data, the computational basis of spectral analysis is discrete Fourier transforms (DFTs). DFTs transform time-or space-based data into frequency-based data (Adams et al, 2012). Recently, a new DFT database based spectral approach has been developed Alharbi and Kalidindi, 2015;Knezevic and Kalidindi, 2017) to solve the crystal plasticity constitutive equations, which reduces the computational cost of performing crystal plasticity calculations tremendously (up to two orders of magnitude) by allowing compact representation and fast retrieval of crystal plasticity solutions.…”
Section: Crystal Plasticity Computations Using Database Of Dftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For discrete data, the computational basis of spectral analysis is discrete Fourier transforms (DFTs). DFTs transform time-or space-based data into frequency-based data (Adams et al, 2012). Recently, a new DFT database based spectral approach has been developed Alharbi and Kalidindi, 2015;Knezevic and Kalidindi, 2017) to solve the crystal plasticity constitutive equations, which reduces the computational cost of performing crystal plasticity calculations tremendously (up to two orders of magnitude) by allowing compact representation and fast retrieval of crystal plasticity solutions.…”
Section: Crystal Plasticity Computations Using Database Of Dftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of recovering the solutions from this new database is roughly the same as the earlier database, which is still about two orders of magnitude faster than the conventional computations. The number of simulations required for generating DFT database was reduced by taking advantage of the symmetry relations for cubic crystals (Adams et al, 2012) and the mirror symmetry evident within the periodic domain of θ (see Fig. 2).…”
Section: Crystal Plasticity Computations Using Database Of Dftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is preferable to adopt a microstructure quantification framework that allows one to increase systematically the numbers of potential features included in the analyses. In this regard, the framework of n-point spatial correlations [12,53,54] offers tremendous promise because of its scalability (ability to define an infinite number of microstructural features), organization (value of n can start with one and increase systematically), and available access to efficient computational toolsets [55,56]. Another option for this step includes lineal path functions [57] or chord-length distributions [58,59] that provide information about shape and size distribution of a specific feature of interest.…”
Section: Data Science Workflow For Extracting Process-structure Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the two-step process [14] described above has enabled the rapid identification of MTR clusters, each distributed about a common texture component with a defined misorientation range (<10°in this case) within each cluster. The cluster analysis was conducted with a feature vector of 551 dimensions in domain of the generalized spherical harmonics (GSH), a mathematical construct commonly used to analytically describe the distribution of crystallographic orientations [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The normal direction (ND) inverse pole figure (IPF) maps in Figure 6a, b show the variability of the length scale from primary alpha grains in (b) to MTRs in (a).…”
Section: Identification Of Features Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In materials with complex structures, one has to identify suitable hierarchical length scales for homogenization, which are called regions of homogeneity. ROH can be established objectively at different hierarchical length scales by carefully quantifying spatial correlations (e.g., using two-point spatial correlations [17,[25][26][27][28][29][30]) and finding suitable window sizes in the microstructure that capture the inherent heterogeneity (FoI and their spatial distributions) to a desired accuracy. It is also desired to keep these ROH small enough to enable costeffective modeling (the computational cost rises steeply with increases in the number of voxels needed to capture the ROH).…”
Section: Representative Descriptions Of Microstructure Regions Of Hommentioning
confidence: 99%