2012
DOI: 10.1557/opl.2012.903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design for Reliability and Common Failure Mechanisms in Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers

Abstract: Vertical-Cavity Surface-Emitting Lasers are making up a large and growing share of the world's production of semiconductor lasers. But the 850 nm GaAs quantum well VCSELs that make up most of present product are highly vulnerable to dislocation networks. In this paper, we discuss how materials selection affects the reliability of semiconductor lasers generally. We then describe the most common failure mechanisms observed in VCSELs, and what precautions are used to prevent them. We finish with a brief discussio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And such random failure caused by the latent damage or hidden flaw cannot always be screened out through the burn-in process. Our randomly failed VCSELs typically showed the dendritic type of defect patterns, which agreed with the reported result in literature [12], [17], [18], we therefore wanted to find how such featured patterns could possibly be formed. Understanding the dynamic process of defect generation and expansion in VCSELs is essential for improving their reliability.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…And such random failure caused by the latent damage or hidden flaw cannot always be screened out through the burn-in process. Our randomly failed VCSELs typically showed the dendritic type of defect patterns, which agreed with the reported result in literature [12], [17], [18], we therefore wanted to find how such featured patterns could possibly be formed. Understanding the dynamic process of defect generation and expansion in VCSELs is essential for improving their reliability.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…where D represents the average distance from the defect source to the initial aggregation point. This is because for any point 0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑙, the time required for a diffusion process from D to x is given by the integrand in (18) according to (17). The total required time for x to move from 0 to l is therefore given by (18).…”
Section: Appendix A: Dla-based Solution Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) For a more complete discussion of common VCSEL failure mechanisms, please refer to our recent publications. 9,11) …”
Section: Vcsel Failure Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last part of the aging process, the defects reach the active layers causing not only an enhanced optical degradation but also a second variation of the series resistance. This degradation mode is remarkably new, since most of the past reports on the degradation of oxide-confined VCSELs blamed the presence of extended defects (such as dark line defects) and/or cracks, mostly coming from the oxide layers, as the root cause of the poor device lifetime observed [17], [18], [19]. These defects are supposed to be already present in the semiconductor material after device growth, worsening the radiative efficiency or acting as preferential sites for the formation of additional defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%