Residential Crowding and Design 1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2967-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design Implications of Spatial Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was most significant for crowded newcomers. These results are in accord with studies by environmental psychologists (e.g., Evans, 1979), which indicate that placement of activities along a wall helps in coping with crowding. On the one hand, by staying in the peripheral zone one can look at the wall and there a newcomer can reduce eye contact with the other people in the room.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This effect was most significant for crowded newcomers. These results are in accord with studies by environmental psychologists (e.g., Evans, 1979), which indicate that placement of activities along a wall helps in coping with crowding. On the one hand, by staying in the peripheral zone one can look at the wall and there a newcomer can reduce eye contact with the other people in the room.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…I then distinguished between squares belonging to a central zone encompassing the middle of the room and those belonging to a peripheral zone located along the physical boundaries (e.g., walls, shelves, information desk) of the room. Because architectural features of settings moderate people's behavior and their experiences (Evans, 1979;Fuhrer, 1987), I then counted how often a newcomer had entered a square of the central or one of the peripheral zone while dealing with the unfamiliar setting (see for more details Fuhrer, 1990b).…”
Section: Knowledge Through Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the broader literature, it has long been recognized that density can not fully capture the experience of individuals in a given space (Day and Day 1973;Evans 1979). A number of studies also claimed that the major limitation of using density as a crowding measure is a lack of consideration of individual perceptions of in-vehicle crowdedness (see, e.g., Turner et al 2004;Cox et al 2006).…”
Section: Subjective or Psychological Components Of Crowdingmentioning
confidence: 99%