2016 Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/apemc.2016.7522931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of 60-GHz microstrip antenna array composed through circular contour feeding line

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The antennas with single and four elements in array were analyzed using electromagnetic analysis software. The results at 28 GHz show that 8.393 dB can be achieved for antenna gain compared to the previous work: 3.7 dB in [9], 2.99 dB in [13] and 7.1 dB in [14]. Caused by enhanced performance, this proposed antenna quality serve as a good option for 5G which requires low topology and high gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antennas with single and four elements in array were analyzed using electromagnetic analysis software. The results at 28 GHz show that 8.393 dB can be achieved for antenna gain compared to the previous work: 3.7 dB in [9], 2.99 dB in [13] and 7.1 dB in [14]. Caused by enhanced performance, this proposed antenna quality serve as a good option for 5G which requires low topology and high gain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The little gap issue shows itself in the Friss condition as loss proportional to carrier frequency and is frequently incorrectly credited to propagation [2]. The problem of small aperture antenna easily overcomes by antenna array with gains [14][15] [16]. This improve gain is require in obstructed radio environment where, among others, human bodies are likely blockers of the milimeter wave interface [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the proposed design outperforms the previously reported results, in terms of bandwidth and gain. [24] 4.35% 9.3 N.A Circular contour feeding line [25] 0.5% 8.4 −6.8 to 8.4 (58 to 62 GHz) Linear feeding line [26] N.A 11.5 6.5 to 12 (58 to 62 GHz) Annular Feeding Line [27] 1.8% 9.5 −4 to 10.8 (58 to 62 GHz) Yagi (PCB) [28] 10.5% 18 n.a Planar Antenna Array [29] 4.2% 22 20.4 to 17.6 (59-62) Proposed work 20.7% 11.8 >11.2…”
Section: Optimal Design and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete antenna is adopted by means of 4 similar branches in which each one among is developed by using three rectangular patches which are linearly serialized. As a end result, the optimized microstrip antenna array can attain the gain of 8.4 dBi at a frequency range of 60 GHz [4].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 95%