2004
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2004.836638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Boost Power Factor Correction Converter Using Optimization Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The design and optimization of boost PFC converters have been widely discussed in the literature [17]- [20]. Essentially, for simple first-order voltage loop compensation, for instance, the design begins with determining the output capacitor value according to the holdup time requirement.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design and optimization of boost PFC converters have been widely discussed in the literature [17]- [20]. Essentially, for simple first-order voltage loop compensation, for instance, the design begins with determining the output capacitor value according to the holdup time requirement.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem was also reported in previous research [2], [4], [25]. In order to avoid the optimization to be trapped at the local minima, the switching frequency is kept constant in each optimization branch.…”
Section: A Fixed Switching Frequency Branchesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It can be implied by (25) that the DC resistance of the inductor is proportional to the square of the inductor value. Since the current ripple of the output inductor is smooth, the frequency harmonics is summed up to the 5 th harmonics to calculate the copper loss of the inductor, given by (27).…”
Section: Output Inductormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common objective functions to minimize are weight [98,99,[102][103][104], cost [32,99,102,[104][105][106][107][108], volume [102,[108][109][110], emitted radiations and thermal resistance of a heatsink [111], area [104,105] and power losses. Alternatively, the optimization can be achieved through efficiency maximization [57, 69, 98, 99, 101, 103-105, 108-110, 112-115].…”
Section: B Control Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%