2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2016.7523768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a hydraulic ankle-foot orthosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A lot of existing devices are characterized by a complicated design using many sensors, which requires complex control algorithms [30]. Different control strategies can be found in the literature, such as fuzzy logic control [31], PID (position) control [32], adaptive control [33] and inverse dynamics control [34]. Unfortunately, an increase in complexity of control systems through multiple sensors and impedances does not ensure the best solution for orthotic devices, because they are becoming cost-intensive and not suitable for daily use [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of existing devices are characterized by a complicated design using many sensors, which requires complex control algorithms [30]. Different control strategies can be found in the literature, such as fuzzy logic control [31], PID (position) control [32], adaptive control [33] and inverse dynamics control [34]. Unfortunately, an increase in complexity of control systems through multiple sensors and impedances does not ensure the best solution for orthotic devices, because they are becoming cost-intensive and not suitable for daily use [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to passive devices, powered devices have onboard power sources and actuators that can provide positive and negative work to assist the users in the stance phase. They are usually actuated by electric motors [ 8 10 ], artificial pneumatic muscles [ 11 , 12 ], linear or rotary pneumatic actuators [ 13 15 ], and hydraulic cylinders [ 16 ]. In these two categories of ankle-foot orthoses and prostheses, passive devices are relatively more popular in daily use due to their simplicity, compactness, durability, and comfort but have not been shown to sufficiently improve patients' biomechanics and energetic cost [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%