2011
DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2011.597496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design of a Rural Diabetes Self-Directed Care Program

Abstract: This article describes a rural self-directed care program for adults with diabetes. The intervention consisted of coordinating with primary care clinics, six 2-hour facilitated educational peer groups, communication with physicians, referral tracking and follow-up, telephone support, and cooking demonstrations. The educators minimized lectures and they allowed content to emerge from participant questions and concerns. The program provided culturally tailored written educational materials. The author identifies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians and students need to incorporate community profiles in clinical practice. For example, rural and remote communities have higher burden of diabetes disease and fewer resources to manage this (Reddy et al, 2011; Rugh, 2011). Clinicians and students need to be flexible in their approach and use relationship-building skills with their clients, their colleagues, the multidisciplinary team members, and the community as a whole to achieve good clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Recommendations To Clinicians and Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians and students need to incorporate community profiles in clinical practice. For example, rural and remote communities have higher burden of diabetes disease and fewer resources to manage this (Reddy et al, 2011; Rugh, 2011). Clinicians and students need to be flexible in their approach and use relationship-building skills with their clients, their colleagues, the multidisciplinary team members, and the community as a whole to achieve good clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Recommendations To Clinicians and Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%